Among other issues, I am interested in understanding how to support real dialog - not just people talking, but also listening to each other. Current tools support self-expression quite well. They could be better at supporting dialog. What I worry about is that we will have more and more voices online, with everyone in their entrenched positions, and no real effort to understand another point of view.
While this is inevitable to some degree (online voices are a reflection of entrenched positions in the offline world), but tools have a role to play here. Tools used for online expression also support a particular method of social interaction. They offer opportunities for interaction, conversation, and persuasion. There is a social structure enabled by every tool even if it is primarily used for individual expression. For example, the social structure enabled by trackback, wikis, a message board and a commenting system is different. It leads to different types of interaction. I believe that by thinking in a deliberate fashion about the social structure afforded by tools, one can support real dialog better.
This is Rashmi from DialogNow (DialogNow is a community weblog supporting conversation about India and Pakistan)






























Jennifer BreaLatest of 287 posts
Daniel DuendeLatest of 23 posts
Muna AnnahasLatest of 5 posts
Bob ChenLatest of 29 posts
Aparna RayLatest of 17 posts
Deborah Ann DilleyLatest of 160 posts
Elia Varela SerraLatest of 15 posts
Hanako TokitaLatest of 60 posts
Hamid TehraniLatest of 765 posts
Nishadha SilvaLatest of 3 posts
Alan DavidsonLatest of 1 posts
Nicholas LaughlinLatest of 145 posts
Philly Future inspirations
These sites are similar to Philly Future in function. Some of these have provided this site with real inspiration:
Slashdot.org
Metafilter.org
Wow! I didn’t know that site was that good!
Lovely, informative site, thanks