Archive for
May 27th, 2007


Stories

Russia: Vacationing Survey 

a small portrait of this author Veronica Khokhlova · 22:37

Russian-language LJ community eco_altai is a place for fans of ecotourism in the Russian Altai Republic to meet and share impressions and beautiful pictures.

Right now, an interesting survey (RUS) is being conducted there: on vacationing in the Russian Federation.

Only a few dozen bloggers have answered the survey's eight questions so far, but it's currently in the top 10 of the Yandex Blogs ranking, so the number of respondents is likely to grow.

Here's what some of the results look like now:

Question #1: “What's your attitude toward vacationing in Russia?”

32 bloggers think positively of it - but “without fanaticism;” eight bloggers do not care and choose their destination depending on the circumstances; seven bloggers say “it can't be better;” two bloggers would never spend their vacation in Russia and always prefer to travel abroad; and one blogger (LJ user jan-kiepura) vacations in Russia only - “on principle.”

Question #2: “How/where do you spend your vacations in Russia?”

26 bloggers prefer “active rest” - unprofessional camping, skiing, etc.; 20 bloggers go to the countryside - or their dachas; 18 bloggers don't like to venture far away from home and prefer barbeques with friends; 11 bloggers travel to resort areas; and one blogger (LJ user yasheruga) goes on pilgrimage.

Question #3: “Where do you usually vacation in Russia?”

The most popular vacation destination happens to be the Black Sea - including Crimea, which is a Ukrainian territory (23 bloggers report going there); 20 bloggers tour Russia's big cities (Moscow, St. Petersburg, Novosibirsk, etc.); 18 bloggers visit Russia's ancient towns; 13 bloggers go to Karelia; 12 bloggers venture further north; 10 bloggers prefer Altai; and the Ural and the Caucasus each gets seven Russian LJ visitors.

Question #4: “What do you LIKE about vacationing in Russia?”

29 bloggers like the nature's beauty and diversity; 24 bloggers enjoy places that haven't been touched by civilization; as many choose Russia because it means visa-free travel for them; for 17 bloggers it's a way to learn more about their country; low prices appeal to 12 bloggers; six bloggers combine vacations with visits to see friends and relatives living elsewhere; and none of the respondents mention service as their reason for vacationing in Russia.

Question #5: “What do you DISLIKE about vacationing in Russia?”

Bad service (”something's always wrong with the way the trip is organized, the driver's rude, the toilet's leaking, etc.”) is the major drawback for 23 bloggers; 21 bloggers dislike the roads and the infrastructure; 20 bloggers feel sad about the amount of trash; 14 bloggers worry about their safety; 13 bloggers are tired of their compatriots (who “constantly demand to have a drink with them”); ten bloggers feel that all the problems are insignificant; two bloggers want more “exotica” (”palm trees, kangaroos, serfing, etc.”); one blogger (LJ user simeon75) likes it all.

0 comments · »»

Morocco: YouTube is Blocked, and the Blogoma is Not Happy 

a small portrait of this author Jillian York · 17:23

Late Friday night, A Moroccan in Washington D.C. broke the news that YouTube had been blocked in Morocco. He remarked that “It's quite saddening to see such a thing happening in Morocco;a country that has made giant steps in freedoms and socio-economic reforms in the span of short 8 years.”

YouTube is not the first site banned in Morocco. Last year, Livejournal, one of the first blogging sites; and Google Earth, which offers satellite photos in sharp detail of most of the world were blocked. Certain sites and blogs documenting the Western Sahara conflict have been banned for years now, although a few in English remain.

By Saturday morning, the blogoma had exploded in commentary on the subject, some remarking upon why YouTube had been banned, others criticizing the censure. Motic was the first to speculate, saying:

This new censorship, as illegal and unacceptable as all the others, has nothing to do with security. It demonstrates once again how clumsy and awkward the Moroccan policy is towards IT and the internet. Moroccan authorities go another step farther away from mastering this tool. Censoring a site secretly and illegally comes to recognizing the enemy's arguments! Is this the best thing that Morocco can do in order to defend its territorial integrity? Censorship is obsolete, it is a reflex of an older era. It can only be interpreted as a sign of defeat and despair.

The blogger made several other posts in French, documenting the reasons behind the censure.

Au début était le blog (fr) also expressed dismay over the censure:

Vous avez sans doute remarqué que depuis deux ou trois jours que la vidéo de Nass El Ghiwane insérée dans ce billet ne fonctionne plus. Ne cherchez pas d'explications techniques lointaines. Le site Youtube est tout simplement censuré au Maroc par Maroc Telecom, filiale de la multinationale Vivendi! Vous avez très bien lu: on censure encore au Maroc.

You have undoubtedly noticed that in the past two or three days the video of Nass El Ghiwane inserted in this blog does not function any more. Do not seek remote technical explanations. The YouTube site is quite simply censored in Morocco by Maroc Telecom, subsidiary of the Vivendi multinational! You read correctly: censorship still occurs in Morocco.

In the Maroc IT blog, (fr) Omar el Hyani posted a piece urging readers to boycott Maroc Telecom, which seems to be the culprit, and encouraged bloggers to post a graphic in support of the boycott:

Je demanderais à tous les lecteurs de ce blog, de boycotter les produits de Maroc Telecom, et pour ceux qui possèdent un blog ou une page personnelle, d’afficher le logo anti-censure sur leur page

I would ask all the readers of this blog, to boycott the products of Maroc Telecom, and for those who have a blog or a personal page, to post the anti-censorship logo on their page.

censure_mt.JPG

Most bloggers were considerably angry over Maroc Telecom's censoring of YouTube. Youssef at Maghrebism urged readers to take action, stating his own intent to set up a petition against Vivendi International's actions:

The king & government have to realize that progress is not only words. Saying that you’re progressing is not enough. You actually have to take action to progress.

The reason for this post is my disappointment and anger towards to the silence. We have been silent for too long.
We have been silent after Livejournal, after Google Earth. We didn’t make our voices heard.
This is not only shameful but also dangerous. If we stay silent, more sites and services will be blocked.
We have to speak up and say that the recent block of Youtube is wrong and damaging.
The block doesn’t only damage the internet-users but also Morocco.

So please, let us speak up. Let us make our voices heard and stop the deafening silence. I’m planning to set up a petition and contact Vivendi Universal, the mother company of Maroc Telecom. Vivendi Universal has its own department of Sustainable Development, promoting dialogue and social responsibility. Clearly they don’t promote that through the block of a major website?

Morocco Guide surmised that the banning of YouTube will have a negative effect on Moroccan advertising, given the statistics:

You don't need an advanced degree in statistics to conclude that promoting anything in Morocco, music and Hip Hop is the way to go hence this new ad video for the new mobile phone company Sma3ni.
The video was added to Youtube on Mar, 07, 2007 and was viewed by more than 484,876 (surpassing all the 6 versions available at youtube).

In the same vein, El Hafa (fr) noted that the ban will only give a negative view of Morocco while providing free advertising to YouTube: “De cette maniers tous le monde a seulement contribuer a donner encore une fois une image sous-développée du maroc et… faire un peu plus de publiciter gratuite pour youtube.”

Although most bloggers were up in arms over the banning, it would be unbalanced reporting not to mention those who considered the other side. A post in my own blog, The Morocco Report urged bloggers to speak out against censorship: “Personally, I have no idea what we can do, but I know that keeping quiet won’t help. Morocco bloggers, join me in speaking out against internet censorship.” The post garnered an inordinate number of comments arguing for both sides. Two are below:

Myrtus:

While I’m strictly against censorship to silence free speech, personally I can totally imagine why anyone would block You Tube for safety reasons. It’s a perfect medium to pass on any type of information either to influence the masses or to speak in code. While most of us go there for entertainment purposes, there are plenty of political organizations who use it solely for advancing their own political agendas. Who’s to say that terrorist organizations aren’t using it to communicate out there in plain daylight and we don’t even know it.

Everything Morocco:

There is a lot of trash and objectionable, even dangerous material getting posted. I saw a hate video on You Tube that was shocking in the level of ignorance and hostility, but as I said we are all being punished for what a few people are doing and yes, some people are so stupid it is the only way to prevent them from being sucked into an agenda they don’t understand.

Censorship isn’t the answer to eliminating the problem but it’s the simplest method of controlling it/us and government is famous for going for the lowest common denominator and the least thought/work intensive means of problem solving.

It is worth noting that there have been no official news reports as of Sunday afternoon as to the causes behind Maroc Telecom's (or the Moroccan government's) censorship of YouTube. The only post as of yet to make it to the Google News search for keyword “Morocco” was from MidEast Youth. The blogoma eagerly awaits answers.

18 comments · »»

Syria: Presidential Referendum and Lebanon Clashes 

a small portrait of this author Yazan Badran · 17:17

Today, Syria is reelecting president Bashar Assad for a new seven-year term in office. The process is done through a referendum, which means there will be no other challengers. The referendum paper has a green circle that says “Yes” and a gray one that says “No”. The result is expected to be 99.xx% in favour of the president - as is the tradition in Syria for the last 37 years.

Gorrfried Stutz, has only one word to say…

لا

or

No

While Philip I, of Via Recta, says he will toss a coin on the election date,

Heads, I win … Tails, you lose

Syrian Presidential Referendum, Sunday 27 May 2007
The farce continues for 7 more years

Bob, of Nine Months in Syria reported on all the “spontaneous” festivities that have been taking place,

Today, the parade. The government declared Thursday an official holiday in order to allow bureaucrats, undercover security agents and students alike to express their support, providing free bus transportation to and from the event. Responsible parties noted the names of those who might have forgotten to attend.

Tens of thousands – official accounts will tell us hundreds of thousands – of participants crowded downtown, waving likenesses of the president and nylon Syrian flags that were already frayed by 10 a.m.

Tony Badran, of The Syrian Monitor reports that, the opposition has decided to boycott the referendum…

As to whether a boycott is the best way to send a message and make the voice of the democratic opposition heard, Manna' said, “I am personally against any presidential referendum, and I consider it to be a form of political fraud and deceit, conducted by the authoritarian regime to force citizens into being partners in the crime of violating free elections in broad daylight. It does not even rise to the level of the bay'a [the traditional political contract between ruler and ruled] known in Arab and Islamic history, nor is it remotely related to the idea of electing a president of the republic.”

Meanwhile, in Washington D.C. a group of activists have gathered in front of the Syrian Embassy to protest the referendum, Ammar Abdulhamid of Amarji, reported from site.

The crowd was pretty diverse, and represented Syrians from various backgrounds, ethnic and political. There were also some American and Arab participants who wanted to show their support of our cause. For this, they have our lasting gratitude.

Moving on to our neighbor Lebanon, the last week witnessed very violent clashes between the Lebanese army and an Islamic extremist group by the name of Fatah al-Islam. The Lebanese army have closed on the group in a Palestinian refugee camp called Nahr el-Bared, which houses more than 33,000 refugees.

Lebanese politicians were quick to blame Syria for the group, and while this is always a possibility in a country like Lebanon, several reports came out contradicting that. Many of the reports have even claimed that the group was actually started and funded by the Lebanese anti-Syrian March 14th group, and particularly the majority leader Saad Hariri. Hariri, who is the son of the late prime minister, Rafik Hariri, was accused according to several reports [including this article by Seymor Hersh, which was published long before the clashes began] by funding Islamist Sunni groups with the help of the Saudis to combat the Shia influence in Lebanon, represented by Hizbulla. The reports say that the groups have turned against Hariri, because the funding stopped.

Rime Allaf writes,

So if Syria dun it (which I am not saying it didn’t), did it ask the men to rob the bank, and to lead the army to them, and to make sure it would cause so many casualties in the army, and to then get shelled by the army, and for general chaos to ensue, so that the tribunal wouldn’t come? The analysis goes like this: the Syrian regime is trying to make sure that the tribunal does not happen, so it pushes some buttons and sets the area on fire. Not an unreasonable analysis. It’s also a logic that has the culprit assuming that the Lebanese would go running to the UN to retract the demand for an international tribunal under Chapter VII. Well, that’s what Murdoch’s increasingly trashy publication, The Times, says in yesterday’s editorial: it’s simply Syrian blackmail.

And while the political aspect is very vague, the humanitarian aspect is very clear. Over 30,000 Palestinian refugees are trapped in the camp, under heavy shelling and fighting, with no food and no water for the last five days. It is a real humanitarian crisis. As Golaniya reports her first hand observations when she went to the camp with an aid truck.

So today and after we delivered the supplies to the Safad Bedawi hospital, and to a clinic in Bedawi camp, we went to these theoretical meetings Swedish NGO called Save the Children which are organizing to “educate” the Palestinian refugees' student since they are missing classes and all. So we are talking about people who have no place to stay, no covers, not enough food, no diapers, wounded, have missing families..etc and they are worried about educating them, so we left them alone with their meetings.

Abu Kareem, of Levantine Dreamhouse, reflects on the whole issue, and feels that it is time to settle the refugee crisis in Lebanon

One thing that I am certain about it that it is time for Lebanon to change the way it deals with Palestinian refugee camps and their inhabitants. I blame both Palestinian and Arab leaders for the way the plight of three generations of Palestinian refugees was politicized. Everyone wanted them to remain refugees because, the logic went, if they settled (tawteen) in the land of their refuge, they would lose their right and their will to return to Palestine. So instead they languished in misery for 60 years. In Lebanon, their plight was complicated even further by fears that their presence was going to affect the sectarian mix. So the Lebanese state gave them few rights and restricted their ability to work. Most, consequently, remained stuck in abject poverty with no legal documents to allow them to go anywhere and not way to improve their lot. It is no wonder that the refugee camps, rife with despair, became breeding ground for extremism. Add to that the fact that the Lebanese authorities have no jurisdiction within the camps and you a have a recipe for repeated disasters.

Yazan, reflecting on the painful last 3 weeks, posts a link to one of Omar Amiralay's most impressive documentaries. A testimony of Saadallah Wannous, the late play writer, on the whole conflict from his own personal perspective, just few months before he surrendered to his cancer for the last time.

When I close my eyes, and see in the back of my head, images of Palestinians fighting against eachother, of a stateless people dragging themselves into a civil war.
No one can describe this utter feeling of helplessness you feel when you see one of the most genuinely painful Human causes, disintegrating.

I go back to Saadallah Wannous, and quote him, “There are many things that one can talk about…”

1 comment · »»

Venezuela: Bloggers Mobilize For and Against the End of Transmission of Radio Caracas Television. 

a small portrait of this author Luis Carlos Diaz · 14:25
lingua → pt · zht · zhs

The television channel Radio Caracas Television (RCTV) has enjoyed the ability to transmit over an open television frequency for the past 53 years. It is the oldest television channel in the country, and its license for the use of the frequency will expire. The Venezuelan government decided not to renew the license, just as we have written in the past.

The debate in the country continues to be the same: on one side the opposition to the Chavez government considers that this has to do with political retaliation in punishment for the channel's role of political opposition, and on the other hand, the Chavistas support the measure because it can now “liberate” the open television signal from a channel that has destabilized the country through its propaganda.

There is very little gray area in a situation so polarzied, but the best thing is to read both sides.

The Venezuelan blog directory To2blogs.com opened a special section about RCTV and is collecting all of the posts that the Venezuelan bloggers are writing about the subject. This tells us about the importance of this governmental action in the morale of the Venezuelan blogosphere, because in itself, the process is another opportunity for political confrontation, as we have become accustomed to. Blogs have been created especially about the topic, those that are in favor the measure (RCTV from the inside) or against it (I am with RCTV).

Up until now, there are more than 2,000 articles just in that site alone. There is a wealth of opinions about this conflict.

A channel without signal is a closed channel?

Within the political correctness language, “the non-renewal of the channel's license” means that it cannot transmit over open signal, which will affect the channel's economic standing and also the viewers will not be able to see it. The channel will not close, but it is restricted to transmit over cable, but because there is also no Digital TV technology in Venezuela, it ends this discussion.

Freedom of speech, public or private

The internal debates within each blog, such as the one at Slave to the PC [ES] with more than 200 comments, center upon whether the measure against the private channel represents a violation of freedom of speech.

Kira Kariakin comments:

Para mí la cuestión radica en los principios que mueven una sociedad que se precie de democrática y en esos principios están incluidos no solo la libertad de expresión, sino el derecho a la disensión, al juicio justo, a la defensa, a la protesta, al trabajo, a la propiedad privada, entre tantos otros que con este retiro de la concesión de la señal para RCTV se violentan. Luego de sentado un precedente como éste no habrá marcha atrás en cuanto a la libertad de expresión en los medios.

For me, the question is based on the principles of a society that enjoys democracy, and within those principles they also include not only freedom of speech, but also the right to dissent, to a fair trial, to a defense, to protest, to work, to private property, among others, which are some of the ones that are threatened with the withdrawal of RCTV's license. After a precedent is set like this there is no turning back in regards to the media's freedom of speech.

Iria at Resteados [ES] criticizes the quality of the channel and thinks that the problem of freedom of speech goes beyond whether or not it stays on the air:

RCTV sigue siendo hoy, el canal que hace 12 años dejé de ver por razones éticas y estéticas. No ha cambiado en estos meses desde que Chávez le dictó la sentencia de cierre.

Así que no tengo más que repetir: “Yo no estoy con RCTV”.

RCTV continues to be the channel that I stopped watching 12 years ago for ethical and aesthetic reasons. It has not changed during the months that Chavez gave its sentence of closing.

So, I have nothing else but to repeat, “I am not with RCTV”

Lubrio asks at El Espacio de Lubrio [ES] whether opinions and protests are really restricted in Venezuela, and provides an example of the opposition march on May 19, in which there was not a single repressive event.

La oposición marchó el 19 de mayo de 2007 en defensa de RCTV. Miles de opositores marcharon pacíficamente, algo que no pasa en dictaduras. Sin embargo, varios líderes opositores hacen llamados a que el 27 de mayo la población debe permanecer en las calles creando desestabilización para sacar al gobierno, lo cual es transmitido con normalidad en Globovisión y RCTV. Hasta llaman estúpido al Presidente Chávez.

The opposition marched on May 19, 2007 in defense of RCTV. Thousands of members of the opposition marched peacefully, which is something that does not happen in dictatorships. However, various opposition leaders are making calls that on May 27 for the population to remain in the streets creating destabilization in order to remove the government, which is a message transmitted with normalcy on Globovision and RCTV. They are even calling President Chavez stupid.

This week appears to be the end of the line for the channel. The license expires at midnight on May 27 and another Public Service station designed by the state called Tves will begin to broadcast. This is another station in the hands of the state, in addition to the official station and another four that are broadcasting on a national level.

Caracas is particularly tense and filled with protests and mobilizations for the past week. Vendors, actors and workers of the channel, university students, politicians, television viewers and members of political parties have all taken to the street … all in favor or against the shutdown of the station. Marches and gatherings are separated by geographic and ideological distances. The opposition is actively distributing audio of the protest (mp3) via the internet on the nights of the 26th and 27th in order to sound an alarm in favor of freedom of speech. The government has released the National Guard and Armed Forces in the city since Friday to prevent any public disorder.

On Monday morning, another intense reason for the political conflict will have taken place. The communications war in Venezuela will continue, even though the opposition will have one less channel at its disposal.

For a photoset, visit h_xavier's Flickr.

6 comments · »»

Korea: Bloggers are not reporters 

a small portrait of this author Hyejin Kim · 13:17
lingua → zht · zhs

On the 19th of this month, one of the major internet portal sites announced the new period of blog journalism in Korea. Their section, media daum blogger news which opened last November, like other portal sites chose blogger reporters within their portal site, and showed news from their own blogger reporters. Bloggers had a hard time finding other bloggers’ posts by topics and looking for quality posts. The new decision of Daum is to start putting blog news from other portal sites, setting up the direct link to those blogs, and using trackback and RSS systems. They also promised to establish more active blog reporters, such as video clip reporters. After this news, some blggers are happy about it, but others are not. Some bloggers are concerned about their identities and functions of blogs.

A post of a blogger, philomedia, received the interest of other bloggers.

블로거는 기자가 아니다.
나는 ‘블로거는 기자가 돼서는 안된다'고 생각한다. 따라서 블로거는 ‘취재'를 해서도 안된다고 생각한다. (물론 전업기자가 쓰는 블로그나, 전업은 아니더라도 글쓰는 일을 직업의 일부로 삼는 사람들이 쓰는 블로그는 예외다. 그것은 개인 블로그에서 ‘발생한 뉴스'가 아니라, 직업기자가 블로그에 ‘쓴 뉴스'다.) 내가 잘못 생각하고 있는지는 모르겠지만 블로거와 기자의 가장 큰 차이는 ‘취재'를 하느냐 하지 않느냐에 있다고 본다. ‘취재'라는 것은 내 이야기가 아니라 남의 이야기를 간접경험하는 일이고 ‘기사'는 이런 취재를 바탕으로 또다른 제3자(대중)에게 남의 이야기를 알려주는 일이다. 취재의 넓이와 깊이, 기사의 문장력과 매체력에 따라 그 기사가 좋은 기사, 훌륭한 기사가 될 수 있을지 몰라도 취재해서 쓴 이야기는 어디까지나 남의 이야기를 간접경험한 이야기일 뿐이다.

Bloggers are not reporters.
I think that ‘bloggers should not be reporters.’ Therefore, bloggers should not ‘collect news’ either (Professional reporters’ or writers’ blogs are exceptional because their writings are not the news which appear in individual blogs, but those which are written professionally). My thought could be wrong, but I really think the big difference between bloggers and reporters is ‘collecting news’ or not. ‘Collecting news’ is not talking about my story, but experiencing other stories. An ‘article’ makes other people know about those stories. The depth of ‘collecting news’, writing skills, and media power influence whether an article is good or not.

반면 블로그는 내 이야기다. ‘내 이야기'가 일반적으로는 받아들여지지 않는 엉뚱한 이야기일수도 있고, 일반화할 수 없는 특이한 이야기일 수도 있으나 그것은 엄연한 팩트(fact)를 바탕으로 한다. 팩트를 가진 사람이 본인의 입으로(제3자의 입을 빌리지 않고) 스스로 퍼블리싱하는 게 블로그이다.코끼리를 본 적은 없으나 코끼리를 많이 본, 전문적으로 본 사람을 취재하여 코끼리를 그린 그림이 기사라고 한다면 코끼리를 전체적으로 보지는 못했으나, 코끼리 다리 만진 사람이 올린 팩트, 코 만진 사람이 올린 팩트, 꼬리 만진 사람이 올린 팩트, 그러다가 코끼리를 전부 다 본 사람이 올린 팩트들이 모두 모여서 거대한 진실을 만들어 나가는 게 블로고스피어라고 나는 생각한다.

On the other hand, blogs are about their own stories. ‘My story’ could be regarded as absurd or not common content. But it is based on fact. And the fact is published by that person in his (or her) own blog. In other words, a person who has never seen elephants interviews a person who has seen elephants many times or a professional. It is an article. On the other hand, the fact that a person touched an elephant’s leg, the fact that a person touched its nose, the fact that a person touched its tail, and the fact that a person saw an elephant… all these facts gather together. The blogosphere’s job is to get them together and to make a big truth.

블로거는 기자 흉내도 내서는 안된다.
블로그가 대안 미디어로 기대를 모으고, 많은 사람들이 블로고스피어의 발전을 바라는 것은 그동안 제도권 언론이 전해주는 간접적 사실에 의존하여 세상을 바라보던 것을 이제 팩트를 가진 사람들이 모여 진실을 공유할 수 있게 될 것이라는 기대감 때문이다. 따라서 블로그는 자신이 본 것만 말하고 경험한 것만 써야 한다. 어줍잖게 기자 흉내를 내서는 안된다. 자신이 본 몇 개의 팩트를 바탕으로 억지로 일반화시키는 제도권 언론의 잘못된 전철을 답습해서도 안된다. 괜히 블로그뉴스, 블로그기자단 이라는 단어에 현혹돼서 기사를 쓰기 위해 본업을 제쳐두고 기사꺼리 찾으러 돌아다니거나, 없는 사실을 과장해서 이야기하거나, 하지도 않은 가공의 인터뷰를 적거나 하는 일은 정말 해서는 안되는 일이다.

Bloggers should not even imitate reporters.
Blogs are alternative media. The reason why many people look forward to the development of the blogosphere is that they don’t have to depend on facts that conservative media have given them any more. They can share the truth with people who have different facts. Therefore, bloggers should write things they have really seen and experienced. They shouldn’t try to be reporters. They should not follow the paths that conservative media get accustomed to, which they write based on a few facts that they saw. Being enticed by nice words, ‘blogger news’ and ‘blog reporter team,’ bloggers don’t have to look for a thing in order to write an article, exaggerate stories not based on fact, and write a post based on imaginative interview.

그냥 자신의 생업에, 일상에 충실하게 살다가 남들과 꼭 공유하고 싶은 팩트가 발생했을 때 한 번씩 블로그에 글을 올리면 그만인 것이다. 좀더 적극적으로 나간다면 미디어다음의 이슈트랙백 같은 코너에 자신이 가장 잘 알고 있는 문제에 대한 이슈가 올라왔다면 트랙백으로 글을 올려주는 정도면 더 할 나위가 없을 것이다. 그러나 미디어다음은 그렇게 생각하지 않는 것 같다. 며칠 보지는 않았지만 미디어다음의 블로거뉴스를 보면 순수한 의미의 블로거들을 육성하기보다는 ‘프리랜서 기자'를 육성하고자 하는 것처럼 보인다. 미디어다음이 막강한 트래픽(독자수)을 무기로 다음의 우산 아래 들어오는 프리랜서 기자를 양산하고, 이를 바탕으로 그동안의 편집권력에서 더 나아가 콘텐츠에 있어서까지 기성언론과 맞상대하겠다는 생각을 갖고 있다면 이는 블로고스피어에 좋은 일일까? 설사 그것이 다음의 기획의도가 아니라고 하더라도 그런 식으로 흘러갈 공산이 다분하다. 그것은 기성언론사보다 훨씬 많은 독자수를 보유하고 있는 포털사이트가 블로거에게 ‘기자'라는 타이틀을 부여하고, 보상체계를 갖추고, 우수한(?)블로거에게는 편집권력을 부여함으로써 이미 시작된 것이나 마찬가지다.

Just have your own life. And when a fact, which you would like to share with others, comes about, you can put up a post. If you would like to be more active, check ‘issue trackback.’ If there is an issue you are knowledgeable about, you can write about it. However, it seems that it’s not the intention of the portal site. It is likely that they would like to cultivate ‘freelance reporters,’ rather than bloggers. If they cultivate freelance reporters, is it good for the blogosphere? Maybe it is not what they are aiming for, but it could be directed. Portal sites have more readers than conservative media now. They endow the title, ‘reporter’ to bloggers and give compensation. Excellent (?) bloggers among them even have previleges of editing.

On Philomedia's blog, Nova agreed with his opinion.

저 역시 블로거는 자신의 이야기를 하는 것으로 충분하다고 생각합니다. 그리고 취재라는 형태를 통하지 않고, 개인의 이야기가 직접 전달되는 구조라는 점에서 RSS 신디케이션과 블로그스피어의 역할에 큰 기대를 가지고 있습니다. 이런 생각 때문인지 미디어다음이 말하는 프로블로거, 블로거기자, 기사라는 용어가 마음에 들지 않는 점도 있습니다.

I also think that bloggers should just talk about their own stories, not collect news in order to write an article, I look forward to the roles of blogosphere and RSS syndication because, through them, their stories will be directly spread around. So, I am reluctant to terms, such as pro-blogger, blogger reporter, blogger articles, which Media Daum often uses.

On the other hand, Sepial had a different opinion.

소속이 없다는 점은 담당 데스크의 압력때문에 소신을 꺾을 일이 없고, 블로거이기 때문에(그야말로 뉴스 생산자이자 소비자니까…) 보다 독자와 가까운 글을 쓸 수 있으며, 아무래도 기자보다야 청탁으로부터 자유롭지 않은가 싶습니다… 틀에 박히고 위에서 내려오는 기사가 아닌 기사를 읽을 수 있어서 저는 블로거뉴스도 나름 좋아합니다.

Without any attachment, bloggers can be free to write what they believe. They can write (as the position of both producer and consumer of news) articles which are closer to readers. They might be much more free because they don’t get any favor like reporters do… I like their writings because their writings are not stereotyped.
0 comments · »»
Funders
Sponsors
Korea content
supported by
OutBlaze Japan content
supported by
SanrioTown