Archive for
December 24th, 2007


Stories

Bangladesh: The Musée Guimet affair 

a small portrait of this author Rezwan · 10:56
lingua → es
sample image for this post

From January 2008 the Musée Guimet of France is holding an exhibition of the masterpieces of Ganges from the collections of the Bangladesh museums for the first time outside of Bangladesh. From the museum catalogue:

“Bangladesh possesses an immensely important cultural heritage, this arising from the fact that the eastern half of Bengal has been one of the cultural richest regions of the Indian world; a vision far from the catastrophic one that the western world often tends to favour. The region is associated with the art of the Pala and Sena dynasties (8th – 13th century)….and goes back to the Maurya and Sunga periods (3rd – 1st century BC)….Bangladesh also harbours the oldest Buddhist monastery of the Indian world, Paharpur, which has now been listed on the UNESCO’s list of protected monuments.”

Sonar Bangla

Black and Grey blog has more on the backgrounds of the archeological artifacts in question. (Image courtesy: Black and Grey)

This exhibition was scheduled to start from October, 2007 but was delayed due to a lot of drama. Bonbibi at Unheard Voices reported on the first of October, 2007:

“The conditional has crept in because the High Court has issued a two-month stay order on the travel of the 189 art pieces following a writ petition by a group of Bangladeshis. They raised concern over the legality of the contract and filed a public litigation case in the High Court that ordered to stop sending the exhibits. The litigants feared that the precious items to be sent to the Paris museum might not be returned to Bangladesh (‘The New Nation’ 27th Sept 2007).”

Unheard Voices later reported of an unholy alliance that stopped the archeological artifacts from sending:

“…a (second) case was filed before the District Court, again by ‘art lovers’ including former DGs of Archaeology etc. Interestingly, the case was filed (according to newspaper report) against the French Ambassador and others. The Court issued a show cause order, but did not stop the artifacts from going.

At this point, with no more puppets to join the dance, the DGFI’s (Military Intelligence) fist finally came out from beneath the glove. It directly intervened at the airport to stop the artifacts from going on the ground that an ‘inquiry’ is to be held.”

Unheard Voices blog also posted the protests in detail which raised concerns over the security of the artifacts during shipping and the financial discrepancies (The total value of insurance is Euro 400,000 whereas only a major artifact is said to be worth more than Euro 800,000).

The Bangladeshi Blogosphere was divided right from the start on the issue. Rumi of In The Middle Of No Where answered the allegations of the skeptics with a question and answer style and commented if a solution is reached sooner than later then:

“The Exhibition will go ahead. And thousands of people will be able to learn about Bangladeshi art architecture and our heritage and to understand the depth and diversity of our culture – in a contrast to the negative images portrayed through the news every day.”

Avalokitsevara

On 1st of December 2007 the first assignment of the archeological artifacts was flown out of Bangladesh to France rather controversially – in the middle of the night in suspicious crates under police guards evading protesters and journalists. In order to camouflage the mission, the authorities utilised vehicles bearing ‘Save The Children Cyclone' and ‘USAID Sidr Emergency Relief' signs.

Renowned photo journalist Shahidul Alam did an excellent piece of investigative citizen journalism. In this post he reports with photos portraying the first consignment being sent to France. He also points to the fact that the Musée Guimet in Paris incidentally had been alleged to hold previous stolen artifacts from Bangladesh and there are similar allegations that stolen objects from China and the rest of Asia are held by the Guimet.

He recently visited the Musée Guimet in Paris but had been denied access to both the director of Guimet Jean-Francois Jarriage and the curator of the show Vincent Lefevre, for the answers to his questions.

Unheard Voices Blog has a brilliant post called “Tintin in Bengal or Musée Guimet controversy” detailing the whole episode with a lots of links to other blogs, pro-contra views, protests, collected media reports, explanations from the French embassy and the organizers and a lot of debate on this issue.

Shahidul Alam also tried to find the missing piece of the jigsaw:

“Guimet is a respected museum, and there has been natural interest in a show that should be very special. Why then such resistance from art lovers of Bangladesh? Surely art is to be appreciated?

Why on the other hand, the secrecy? The organisers should be taking credit for arranging such an event and not trying to sneak away under police protection. If there is nothing to cover up, why the covert operation?

The emotions are high. I’ve seen people weeping because something very special to them has been taken away. I have seen people angry because they feel violated. I have seen people frustrated, because they feel helpless against the power of the establishment.”

And at last the inevitable had happened. Unheard Voices Blog reports:

“At approximately 2 am on Dec 22, one of the 13 crates in the 2nd shipment of artifacts to Musée Guimet in Paris vanished from the tarmac of ZIA International Airport, Dhaka.

Crate 5 contained Statue of Visnu (terracota, black) & Bust of Visnu. High resale value on international underground art market as they are unique pieces.”

Shahidul Alam, who reported about the protests to stop the second shipment is furious:

Their fear of items being stolen, or not being returned, was considered preposterous. News of the missing crate, and the priceless statues it contained, had been suppressed, but the information leaked out. Could the guarantors please explain?

Please stay tuned for the next episode of this thriller.

1 comment · »»

Taiwan: An Ironic Human Rights Day This is a Photos post

a small portrait of this author Portnoy · 06:49
lingua → zht · zhs · pt · jp · bn · es
sample image for this post

In this article, I will carry on the subject from my last article in bringing you information on human rights in Taiwan.

Top Ten News on Human Rights

The Taiwan Association for Human Rights (TAHR) released their picks for “Top Ten News on Human Rights in 2007″ just before the International Human Rights Day. Due to the fact that human rights violations committed by nations are tightly connected with the level of awareness of decision makers and public servants, the TAHR released a “Survey of Candidates in the 2008 Presidential and Congressional Elections on Human Rights Issues”. We can only hope that voters will cast their vote according to the candidates' position on human rights issues.

Government officials make sexually discriminatory comments

An official from the Ministry of Education used the words “girly” and “gay” as a derogatory attack on a political opponent. This triggered enraged reactions from gay rights activists, who held a joint media conference to condemn such behaviour. The official, however, simply brushed off their concern by saying that “‘gay' and ‘girly' were simply used as adjectives”. Bi angrily protested against this behaviour in his blog:

他說的可太輕易了!他可知道有學生就是因為娘,所以受盡男同學的欺負,不敢上廁所怕遭脫褲要驗明正身。他可知道,就是有男人將 gay當作取笑與羞辱的形容詞,以致於一個活生生的男同志在成長過程中,不敢面對與展現真實的自我,一旦出櫃還有遭到排擠失去工作的風險。這種成長經驗的 痛苦,豈是「gay是一個形容詞」所能帶過。

How could he have brushed it off so lightly! Does he know that some students endure bullying from other male classmates for being “girly”, and some are afraid to go to the toilet for fear of being stripped to prove their “manhood”? Does he know that it is precisely because of the derogatory use of the word “gay” that gay men find it difficult to face and to express their true selves in their adolescence, and then face the risk of being ostracised and even fired when the do come out of the closet? These painful experiences gay men endure due to the derogatory use of the word “gay” cannot be brushed off with “it's just an adjective”.

The Taiwanese Feminist Scholars Association also took the opportunity to condemn the use of Patriarchal verbal violence by a number of political figures. Together with other activist groups concerned about gender related issues, they demanded that the Ministry of Education take full responsibility for such behaviour according to the Education (gender discrimination) Act. The activist groups say that the use of discriminatory speech is a serious setback in the gender equality movement and threatens democracy.

An Ironic Human Rights Day

On 10 December, Human Rights Day, the Taiwan Human Rights Park had its opening ceremony. The park is built on the site of a former prison for political prisoners. Victims and their families were invited to the ceremony. Ironically, LeSheng activist groups who attended to protest were mercilessly expelled and arrested!

2100472014_29795216e9.jpg

2099693811_4d6da95d5f.jpg

photo by pinglhow

CoolLoud.com has detailed reports on the incident, and CivilMedia has video clips. Chen, a student who attended the event wrote about what happened in first person account:

大官們魚貫的入場,我們高喊著那些大官們的名字,渴求他們走過來聽聽我們的訴求,看看人權真實的樣貌。無奈,大官沒有來,警察、國安、刑警卻向我們包圍、靠攏。

As the officials filed in, we called out their names, hoping that they would come and listen to our stories and our requests, and to open their eyes to the real meaning of human rights. Unfortunately, none of the officials came over, but the police, national security officers and riot police came towards us and rounded us up.

2099669501_af91c9e993.jpg

2100467852_4434890f9f.jpg

2099683439_79dea2663a.jpg

2100469524_e8e1bd8b99.jpg

Under the threatening gestures from the police (ground barriers have been cleared by this stage), we had no choice but to fall back against a wall, on which, ironically, hung the artistically crafted sign that says “Taiwan Human Rights Park”.

2100457388_54b59c3004.jpg

Grandmas and Gradpas sitting in wheelchairs under this sign. How, very, puzzling.

2099695185_466379b127.jpg

Picture: President Chen Shuibian chaired the opening ceremony of the Taiwan Human Rights Park this morning. Not far from the ceremony, the police were forcefully breaking up a demonstration held by citizens protesting on the LeSheng Leprosy Institute issue. President Chen simply said: “See how different we are from the Nationalist Party.” Photo by coolloud

Minorities supporting each other: new immigrants and gender minorities

Such a chaotic situation may make some people hopeless, but at each corner of society , minority groups are supporting each other! From November, Taiwan's Vietnamese newspaper BaoBonPhuong (Four Corners) united with other BBS sites run by gender minority groups began a project of synchronised reporting of human rights news, focusing on discussions regarding homosexuality, new immigrants, and other issues related to people in the minority. BaoBonPhuong is the only Vietnamese language newspaper in Taiwan. It is targeted towards immigrant workers and new immigrants. The BBS sites involved, on the other hand, are important platforms for contact and information exchange for the gay and lesbian community. The media release of the synchronized reporting project says:

樂生蘇案…許多人權議題仍懸而未決;司法系統或警方對同志、原住民、新移民的不當作為頻傳…社會各處仍有許多無理的對待。這一次跨族群的互惠行動,希望能為人權的寒冬注入一股暖流。

LeSheng Leprosy Institute, The Case of the Three Death Penalties… many human rights issues are yet to be resolved. We often hear about the inappropriate treatment of gays and lesbians, indigenous people and new immigrants by the police…unreasonable behaviour still abounds in our society. This cross-group action benefits all involved and we hope it would add a warm touch to the winter of the human rights movement.

This article is originally written by Foolfitz, and translated into English by Yi. Both Foolfitz and Yi are translators of GV Chinese Lingua.

5 comments · »»

Thailand: Party Supporting Thaksin Leads Thai Elections 

a small portrait of this author Preetam Rai · 01:41
sample image for this post

The PPP or People's Power Party (Phak Palang Prachachon) is leading the tally in Thailand in the first elections after the coup in September 2006. PPP is considered by many as the reincarnation of the Thai Rak Thai party of deposed Prime Minister Thaksin Shinawatra. The party was disbanded after the coup and Thaksin who lives outside Thailand was barred from participating in the Elections but his presence was felt all over as blogger Thaizer writes

The figure of deposed Prime Minister Thaksin Shiniwatra still looms large on the Thai political scene despite his self-imposed exile from Thailand. In the months after the coup, Thaksin’s Thai Rak Thai (TRT) party was banned by the courts and there has been continuing threats of legal action against Thaksin and his family who stand accused of corruption. Although Thaksin and TRT were banned, there seems little doubt to most observers that the PPP is a newly formed version of Thai Rak Thai. The PPP’s policies are the same populist policies that won Thakisn such huge support in the north and north-east of Thailand and it is these voters that have voted for the PPP.

Thai Elections
Image from Colodio's Flickr page

Many commentators believe that is only a matter of time that Thaksin returns to Thailand and resume political activity. The New Mandala blog are celebrating the return of democracy in Thailand.

The coup of September 2006 was a bold roll of the dice. It was based on the hope that what has been termed the “network monarchy” could displace the electoral appeal of Thaksin Shinawatra. The coup was followed by a concerted ideological campaign that sought to contrast the disinterested virtue of the king’s “sufficiency economy” with the profligate populism of Thaksin’s path to economic development.
But the gamble has not paid off. Thaksin’s proxy party, People Power, will form Thailand’s next government (unless the military wants to chance its hand on an even more reckless gamble). People Power will not command a parliamentary majority, but its electoral authority in the parliament will be considerably greater than the drafters of the post-coup constitution would have hoped. A deal with just one other minor party may be enough to achieve a workable majority.

Talking about the other major party - The Democrat Party led by Abhisit Vejjajiva, New Mandala writes in their analysis page.

The Democrat Party have only themselves to blame for their disappointing poll result. They have been given every assistance to win. Their nemesis, Thaksin, was removed by military force. Their opposition, the Thai Rak Thai Party, was dissolved. And in the campaign leading up to this election they received not-so-subtle backing from the palace and the military. But, even with all this extra-electoral support, they still seem incapable of putting together a convincing electoral performance.

Bangkok Pundit, who was running a live blog covering the elections feels that the Democrats have actually done well.

New Mandala has some analysis. It starts with “The Democrat Party have only themselves to blame for their disappointing poll result”. Actually, most polls predicted they would get around 120-130 seats so I don't think it is a disappointing poll result for them. They won less than 100 seats at the 2005 election so around the 160 amount is a good figure for them. Their problem is their coalition partners have done very badly. Actually, I would say there is greater support by the military for Puea Paendin than for the Democrats. Yet this support for Puea Paendin doesn't seem to have helped them. If the military had really supported the Democrats I wonder what that would have done for their poll numbers. The military can control or limit the information that people receive, but they can't make people vote for their candidates. The elite should take notice.

Colonel Jeru (via New Mandala) feels it was the Thai Voters who won.

Thai democracy won in this election. The Thai voters came out in droves to express their will.

The clear winners in this election: The Thai voters first, then, the People Power Party second, and, The Democrat Party third. The clear losers: the military coup makers. The Thai voters delivered a stinging slap in the generals’ faces and said in a clear message . . . we don’t need you generals telling us what is good for us.

The blogger however wants Thaksin to return and face all that awaits him.

This time Thaksin has no more excuses to chicken, he should return immediately to the applause of his hardcore supporters (and courtiers). And Thaksin should return to face all the criminal allegations against him to put closure to all questions of his innocence or guilt once and for all.

While everyone was trying to get to grips with the election figures, the bloggers had to keep going back to mainstream media or Thai government sites. Thai blogger Isriya Paireepairit suggests an internet based “Long Tail” election reporting system.

There is no sophisticated online election reporting system available. The primary source for election result is still TV and reported by centralized government body or media empire.

This project proposes an election reporting system which:

* gather data by massive volunteers, “wisdom of the crowds” aka “long tail” method via proper communication channels
* represent the election result in online visualized format, which enables more accessibility, comparability and accountability
* guarantee acceptable level of accuracy
* highly customizable for various kinds of election, can be easily reuse in different environment

4 comments · »»
Funders
Sponsors
Korea content
supported by
OutBlaze Japan content
supported by
SanrioTown