Archive for
January 17th, 2008


Stories

Bolivia: Blogger Named to National Electoral Court 

a small portrait of this author Eduardo Avila · 18:32
lingua → ar · zht · zhs

The Bolivian blog community is generally very supportive of its members. Recently, a well-known blogger was named to a high ranking position within the Bolivian government. Normally, a pat on the back and other displays of congratulations would have accompanied this new appointment. However, when the blogger in question was named to head up the National Electoral Court (CNE for its initials in Spanish), many bloggers began to question how appropriate was this new member of the CNE.

When José Luis Exeni was appointed by President Evo Morales, very few bloggers questioned his abilities or experience to head up this institution. Most wondered whether Exeni was a member of the Movimiento Al Socialismo (MAS), the ruling party, and whether that would cloud his views toward future electoral processes. They point to his participation in the Montoneros Movement, which is a collection of bloggers that are publicly supporting the controversial Constitution passed in the Constituent Assembly. This Constitution is tentatively set to be passed or rejected by a national referendum, which the CNE will oversee.

Some have pointed to these close ties to the MAS party as somewhat worrisome. Miguel Buitrago of MABB believes that having sympathies from the Electoral Court will favor Morales in the long run.

Exeni's place in the Bolivian blogosphere is well known, and he was invited to be a guest writer at the Bolivian blog community Blogs de Bolivia [es]. His blog Fadocracia [es] currently is closed and there is no sign of previous entries. Shortly after Exeni was named to his new post, Sebastian Molina provided a screenshot of Fadocracia, which showed it to be completely erased. However, days later it was restored to its current state.

Perhaps, the disappearance of his blog articles is a sign that Exeni is well aware of his need to be seen as impartial. Even though fellow blogger and friend Vero assures everyone that Exeni is not a member of the MAS party [es], others aren't quite so sure. Others comment that is is natural for human beings to have their own political opinions, and that outgoing CNE president Salvador Romero must have had his thoughts on the Constitutional proposal [es].

From the newspaper, La Razón:

Los medios le preguntaron qué opina sobre el proyecto de Constitución aprobado por el MAS y sus aliados. Exeni evitó contestar. “Hasta hace tres días con todo gusto le hubiese dado mi punto de vista.”

The media asked his opinion regarding the Constitutional proposal approved by the MAS and its allies. Exeni declined to comment. “Three days ago (before being named to the post), I would have gladly provided my opinion.”

1 comment · »»

Israel: Law for Censorship of Web Comments Passes Initial Knesset Voting 

a small portrait of this author Gilad Lotan · 17:22

Israeli web culture is known for having an active talkback (web commenting) scene. Every major news site allows users to submit comments for every single one of its stories. Israeli culture at its best and worst thrives through discussions held within these spaces; discussions which are planned to fall under future censorship, according to the Talkback Law, proposed by Knesset member Israel Hasson. The proposal passed initial voting in the Knesset yesterday, January 16th.

According to the proposal, a popular site, defined as one with an average of 50,000 hits or more per day, will be considered a “newspaper” and thus liable for the damage or harm caused to a person as a result from its user generated content (i.e. - comments). Ironically, the web post describing this case, published yesterday on the popular ynet news site, has already received over 200 comments.

Hasson's reasoning for the importance of such a law:

“It is unreasonable that a response, possibly anonymous, sent to a newspaper, will be held under the editor's responsibility, but a response submitted to the online portal of that same newspaper will be under nobody's authority… We must not turn the network into a vandalizing, evil tool.”

Gal Mor's recent post describes Hasson's argument as coarse and lacking reference to implications on the basic right for freedom of speech:

Israel Hasson's proposal, which imposes criminal responsibility on commentators, editors and operators of large websites, passed the preliminary vote today. 29 Knesset members supported and only two opposed this evil law proposal. Evil - not because those who slander will tremble before writing now, but because of the lack of reference to the thin texture of freedom of speech. The legislator's coarse treatment of the internet is similar to that of a Beitar (sports group) fan's visit to a museum.

It is hard to claim that Shelly Yachimovich, who opposed the proposal along with Gideon Sa'ar, saved the Knesset's dignity, not even that of the Labor party. But her vote and reasonings are definitely worthy of respect: “the internet works by a different code of conduct from those of traditional media. True, it is not pleasant to have slanderous talkbacks pointed at you, even I feel unpleasant sometimes, but not enough for me to lower the gavel as a legislator. I suggest to remove this proposal from the daily agenda. It harms freedom of speech and will not be effective. The immense advantages of the web outweighs its disadvantages by far.”

It is necessary now to think of an effective response to protest the continuation of this legislative process. For instance, set one day when all the websites block the option to insert a talkback in order to demonstrate what will happen if this proposal is accepted.

UvalS writes about privacy and posts a link to an online petition:

Part of what I like about the internet is anonymity… I do not like being forced to identify or expose of my information on the web. But I do it when I want to, and that is the big difference. No one forces me to identify and give my private information. And here essentially is your problem, Israel Hasson.

I don't really believe in petitions, but to sit and do nothing will never help. Nana created an online petition against the Talkback Law here.

Jonathan Klinger's argument notes the government's attempt to make private entities liable to censor data, and warns that a future implementation of this law will diminish freedom of speech and conversation, as in Iran:

I'd like to emphasize two major topics: death to the culture of discussion on the one hand, and forcing websites to report the amount of traffic on the other. It is clear to everyone that filtering content on the web leads to censorship. It is clear that forcing websites to be liable, will lead to them not supporting the conversation. I do not believe that, by Hasson's words, “we have progressed today a substantial step towards a culture of conversation and mutual honor in the State of Israel”. The only advancement that we saw today, after the approval of this law proposal in the government's committee, is towards a country where censorship is operated by private entities for the government… We will all pay the price for this censorship!

The real blow in rights is that of the websites and their right of property: they will be obliged to report to a government apparatus the number of hits on their pages, the information of their editors and their information stored in a site list. This is substantial damage to one's right of expression, especially when the person does not have the ability to open a website that will act as a stage because he/she will be subject to sign up with a government official. Israel will be like Iran, where website owners must register with the government and be fully liable (for their content).

Hanan Cohen describes his feeling of fatigue, constantly trying to protect Israeli democracy:

… I have a feeling that every time we shout about a new topic, from subject to subject, from law proposal to the next, we become tired. The struggle over a law or against censorship drown us with the little details. And in the meanwhile, the general trend is increasing. We need to start talking about the general trend and point to the forest, not just the trees.

Earlier in his post, Hanan relates to various law proposals which have been brought to the discussion board during the current government's reign in power:

The Talkback Law
The Internet Censorship Law
Communication information Law (Big Brother Law)
Censorship during the second Lebanon war
Daniel Friedman's reform in the legal system
Reduction of the strike's legitimacy as a method for protest

In the meanwhile, the Hebrew blogosphere braces for a fight. Various commentary cartoons and slogans have already been created to draw activists attention to the implications of the Talkback Proposal. Following are two images. The first, a slogan, designed by Liz Cugan and posted on Ma'ariv's site. This translates to “Talkback Now” and relates to a well-known campaign in Israel, rallying for “Peace Now”. The following image is designed with similar font, colors and wording.

tkbk

The illustration below was created by Roni, describing the possible result of posting comments on a site.

roni

4 comments · »»

Armenia: Politics — The Driving Force Behind Blogs? 

a small portrait of this author Artur Papyan · 12:34
lingua → es

Last week, the main topics discussed in the Armenian blogosphere were the election manifesto of former president Levon Ter-Petrossian and the presidential election in neighboring Georgia. It's no wonder that many are now wondering, including bloggers themselves, if politics isn't the driving force behind blogs in Armenia.

“Before the last parliamentary election, the Armenian blogosphere gained serious strength and politics became the driving force behind blogs,” wrote local analyst Samvel Martirosyan on his new Armenian-language blog [ARM]. The blogger is already widely known for his Russian language blog, Kornelij Glas [RUS].

On the one hand, the upcoming elections had the same effect on the Armenian network. On the other, the development of blogs introduced a fresh (for Armenia), but not pleasant “novelty.”

For the past few weeks, a number of anonymous blogs have been launched which are directed towards throwing mud at various presidential candidates. Bloggers that had traditionally taken a more moderate approach, also became “infected” with unrestrained politics. As a result, those taking their first steps in the Armenian blogosphere felt as if they had instead materialized in a psychiatric hospital.

New blogger, Gazan2008, describes the situation [RUS].

For a few days I have been trying to find sensible people in LJ. Even those individuals that I have made friends with are lacking sensibility and balanced arguments. As I managed to see, in Armenian LJs, throwing mud over those who disagree with you has become very popular, as well as demonstrating that “I am against everybody - see how cool I am!!!

Another new blogger, Azat2008, categorizes the Armenian blogosphere [RUS] in the following way:

1. Apolitical female diaries… Run by complete fools thinking only about losing weight, their complexes and surrounding males. Other female owners of such diaries consider themselves above such vain things and thinking only about their “world outlook and related emotions” and belching them up in LJ.

2. Similar males. Designers, programmers, photographers or just flooders, or those that have gone completely nuts and have the same emotions as females…

3. Harshly politicized. Zombied supporters of LTP, their opponents, students, journalists, lawyers, patriots and everybody that is not indifferent to the fate of the country and the region…

4. Informational. There are not so many informational blogs, and recently all of them have become too politicized.

Probably, both established and new bloggers are being fair in describing the situation. Armenian blogs are extremely politicized these days. However, that politicization is not an artificial phenomenon, but a reflection of our daily reality “offline.” Indeed, it has almost become a pattern for blogs to actively respond to significant political events, which are also headline news in the traditional local media, such as the recent presidential election in neighboring Georgia, the publication of Levon Ter-Petrossian’s electoral platform, and the following press conference.

The elections in Georgia were actively followed by Oneworld Multimedia and Mark Grigoryan [RUS]. The first monitored the reaction and feedback of the English-language Georgian blogosphere to the elections, as well as the response of international observers and some foreign media.

The blog came to a sad conclusion:

Actually, the international community, especially the U.S. and Europe, should be quite vocal in condemning some of the dirty tricks Saakashvili’s team resorted to.

[…]

However, as Christine Quirk concludes, “with a strategic pipeline located on Georgian soil, [that] is probably wishful thinking.”

Mark Grigoryan also posted a comprehensive digest of coverage of the Georgian elections by the international media [RUS], but was more interested in the Georgian opposition [RUS] and the characteristics it featured typical of opposition groups elsewhere in the former Soviet space, including Armenia.

The opposition in post-Soviet countries doesn’t know how to lose.

Sometimes it seems to me that it is kind of included in the rules of the game – never to acknowledge the defeat, to go “to the end,” as the oppositionists say, to go on with the struggle, to convene people to rallies and meetings of protest.

In practice, such a behavior leads to a more marginalization of the opposition.

In reality, the interest in Armenia towards the Georgian election was conditioned by one main question that occupies everybody here these days. Basically, how will the coming presidential election be conducted in Armenia? No sooner had the Georgian election passed when former president Levon Ter-Petrossian published his electoral program and the discussions it provoked were then followed at the end of the week by a press conference.

It was no surprise to discover that Armenian bloggers such as Nazarian mainly focused on that. Others, such as JLiving Notes offered some interesting analysis [RUS]:

The first thing that is striking is the fact that the platforms cover a rather wide range of topics that sometimes have nothing to do with our presidential institute.

[…]

The most important thing is that ensuring the constitutional order and, consequently, the civil rights, legitimacy, sovereignty, etc (which, in general, is one of the main functions of a president) is hardly ever mentioned, and even if it is, it has the form of slogans, such as providing equality in front of the law or ensuring/reinforcing independence of the judicial power.

The most fascinating thing is that none of my acquaintances has been appealing to the candidates’ programs while arguing about them. That is, everybody has his /her own motives of choosing a certain candidate. More often people abide by their personal sympathy based either on stereotypes or on their own understanding of the role of a certain politician in the history of the country. Even if people read election programs, they abide not by what the presidential candidates offer. Simply speaking, the people are again attracted by a populist falsification.

At the time of elections, perhaps only humor can save an extremely politicized blog community. Ending with the same blog that we started this post with, Kornelij Glas offers his own sarcastic view of the pre-election field in Armenia [RUS].

LTP wrote a a school composition .

SS goes for the elections with a marvelously creative slogan that could attract Abramovich to his headquarters: Go ahead, Armenia!

Geghamyan’s slogan is stunningly extraordinary. The leader of the party National Unity goes for the elections with the slogan For the sake of National Unity. Johnson meets Johnson.

3 comments · »»

Kazkahstan: Surviving or Prospering? 

a small portrait of this author Adil Nurmakov · 11:52
lingua → es · zht · zhs

Kazakhstan is a country of contrasts, with no exaggeration: desperate poverty neighbors with arrogant wealth, economic growth is accompanied by decline of social sphere and expansion of state control, and tolerance abuts discrimination. Such is the set of topics in focus of Kazakhstani blogosphere this week.

Eilide, a blogger living in Armenia but closely watching the developments in Kazakhstan, wonders if everything is really as good in Kazakhstan as some of her country's experts describe:

“They praise institutional development, stock market and financial sphere on the whole. A nice picture of rich and prosperous country. But there is crisis in banking sector, stock market is still very weak and most pension funds show low profitability. Or am I missing something?”, she asks [ru].

Although financial and banking sector do indeed demonstrate vesible sustainability in comparison with other CIS countries, expansion of the state raises serious concerns of the observers, especially after amendments in the subsoil legislation that had been introduced last year, giving the government an exceptional right to unilaterally cancel contracts with the foreign investors that work in the sphere of extraction of natural resources. (more…)

1 comment · »»
Funders
Sponsors
Korea content
supported by
OutBlaze Japan content
supported by
SanrioTown