feed

Yavor Mihaylov

Stories

May 6th, 2008

Bulgaria: Statehood in Crisis This is a Photos post

Yavor Mihaylov · 09:43 · Eastern & Central Europe
lingua → fr

In early April, a crisis that had broken out as a result of the exposed corruption in the circles of the interior ministry, exacerbated even further. The public was outraged by the fact that the interior minister Rumen Petkov had meetings with the Galevi brothers, who are allegedly among the biggest mafia bosses in Bulgaria. Secret services' records of conversations between alleged traffickers, in which minister Petkov is referred to under the nickname of the Match Lighter, emerged.

As minister Petkov was unwilling to resign, a blogger started a short story contest, asking contributors to describe a scenario that would end in the minister’s resignation. On April Fool’s Day, the most popular joke was that Rumen Petkov has indeed tendered his resignation. The teasing made people laugh and made them feel nervous, as they all were in tense expectation of what was going to happen. The Bulgarian blogosphere was full of photos and collages of parodies of the official.

Cartoon of the Bulgarian Minister Rumen Petkov 1
Change your Match Lighter

Cartoon of the Bulgarian Minister Rumen Petkov 2
* 166 is the phone number of the police
Pictures: http://ntpavlov.blogspot.com/ СС 2.5

An electronic petition for Petkov's resignation was also started (BUL). An anonymous blog - entitled “The best from Rumen Petkov” (BUL) and “devoted to his outrages” - appeared.

It turned out that Petkov was not the only Bulgarian cabinet minister to have met with the Galevi brothers, who were under police surveillance. Health minister Radoslav Gaydarski had also had such meetings. In this connection Delyan Delchev writes (BUL):

A cabinet minister, deputies and a president of state, along with a bunch of journalists, attorneys of prosecution and the former mayor of the town (of Dupnic) […] qualified the Galevis as the businessmen “operatively interesting” [to the secret services]. The whole scenario around them is very interesting, starting from their being part of the ministry of interior structure. The chief secretary of the Bulgarian interior ministry has fallen, the minister is in a precarious position, the EU's funding has been suspended, and there are calls for investigation into the abuses of the State Agency for National Security (because it is not under the jurisdiction of the same minister).

One would think that this should make their lives more difficult… but it looks like a PR campaign is underway, a campaign that makes them not only “operatively interesting,” but also a couple of Very Important People to the people and the state.

[…]

And today we were told that the health minister had met with these “operatively interesting” businessmen in the presence of a mayor who was elected in an interesting manner, to promise a privatization of the hospital in the style of the Union of Democratic Forces’ management-employee buyout companies (RMDs) (do you remember this ultra unsuccessful method of privatization without money, which led to no successful privatization deal, just a free retreat of the state from its own assets, resold by a small camarilla, close to power, at a big profit), only this time it will be called something different, as the name RMD has negative connotations, who knows why.

One day [president of the European Commission José Manuel Barroso] in person will meet them, negotiate and promise things to them, ‘cos, it seems, meeting the prime minister is a waste of time. These legitimate businessmen will then officially represent the state power.

The situation became even more intense when on April 5 president Georgi Parvanov defended minister Rumen Petkov before the media.

Radan Kanev writes in his blog, The Notes of the Reformist (BUL):

President Parvanov undertook a huge responsibility when he said:

“I know minister Petkov well and I know that he has the qualities, has the will power and he has shown, on the basis of the balance that the parliament will probably draw up, that he is able to carry out this reform [in the Ministry of the Interior].”

It is well known that Parvanov knows Rumen Petkov well. It is normal to know the chief of your election campaign. The opposite would be a surprise. It is customary to support the person who secured your election to the highest office in the state. It is understandable to take sides in an acute conflict between two wings in your own party. Especially if you are publicly known initially as a product, and then as a guarding angel, of one of the wings… And so, at least as it meets the eye, it is expected of the president to take a stand and take responsibility, regardless of how rarely he does that in principle.

And still, I doubt that Mr. Parvanov is aware of the meaning of his act. Living into his part of an untouchable political macho, he could not make a sound judgment in how crucial a moment he decided to take a side, or whose side he was taking.

For the first time for the past 20 years, the facts that were the holy of holies of the perestroika and the transition are publicly commented on:

The production and the traffic of drugs, the trade, the import and illegal traffic in excise goods were a business preserve of the Bulgarian state at least from the mid-80s (if not earlier). Whole departments in the secret services and the interior ministry used to devote their patriotic efforts to this illegal or semi-legal business, up to their ears in dirty contacts with mafias from all over the world. It is from these departments where the “moutri” of the transition come, this is where the origins of the “fat cats” in grey suits could be traced back to. It was a public secret that an enormous part of the “godfathers” of transition continued to work for the services into the “new” times, that they were recruited in order to preserve close links of subordination. […] Now everybody is talking out loud about the Galevis and Aleksey Petrov [a former member of SOBT, the Bulgarian special counterterrorism unit. After he left SOBT, Petrov was allegedly close to the mob. He was also the person who organized the meeting between the Galevis and the minister]. There is no difference.

Or briefly – for the first time it is openly said in the media that the dirty business of the secret services has never been privatized. It is in the “banned list” or precisely - the dirty business of the red mafia is “exclusive state property.” And the “exclusive state property is not for sale.” It is only lent on concessions. The titular holder remains the state through the interior ministry services, and the clauses are secret – a trade secret of the mafia. The concessionaires came and went (usually with their feet foreward), but the Contract was still in force, along with the secret of the trinity: state security–organized crime–ministry of the interior. A public secret, but still a secret.

Today the secret is gone. The ugly truth is before our eyes and it is so important that each public position measures up to it. One either supports the “operatively interesting” or is on the side of the operatively uninteresting. You either stand behind your sponsors or in front of the people who voted for you. You are either “a president of all Bulgarians” or “a president of the Galevi brothers.”

On April 7 Bulgaria was in shock as within less than 48 hours two murders were committed. The first victim was Borislav Georgiev, a director of AtomEnergoRemont, one of the major Bulgarian energy companies, and the other – Georgi Stoev, a former gangster, who, after retiring from the criminal groups, began writing books about the connections of the mafia to the power in Bulgaria. Suspicions arose that Stoev was murdered because he had information about Petkov’s connections with another alleged mafia boss – Mladen Mihalev-Madjo.

Delyan Delchev comments (BUL):

The murders have started.

It is interesting when “operatively interesting” businessmen begin meeting practically every member of the cabinet, the European Commission scolds us, and our guys look around startled, waiting to see if the whole thing will settle down within 3 days (10 days actually), and, naturally, the murders start, two within two days, and interesting at that. A person, involved in the energy dealings and a writer involved with the mob were shot down within a space of less than 24 hours. From the interior ministry and the cabinet there flew a comment, like an answer to a question, when the Bulgarian soldiers will be withdrawn from Iraq. One cannot help but think whether the two murders happen to be politically related. Somebody inciting them to destabilize the government. Or take advantage from the weakness of the government, in order to do it. Or just wipe out eyewitnesses and clear the way for new legitimate businessmen?

Ivan Bedrov adds (BUL):

“April 7, little before noon – the press center of the interior ministry announced a forthcoming media conference for the new identity documents. The last sentence informs briefly that minister Rumen Petkov will attend.”

April 7, a little after noon, the press center informs about the passports, but says nothing about the minister.

What could the reason be? The minister simply did not show up.

And what happened in the meanwhile? Nothing much. Just that Georgi Stoev, who has been writing for months stories about the crimes of Mladen Mihalev-Madjo, was shot in the head. And neither the ministry, nor the prosecution did anything.

There seems to be “heat” at the ministry, huh?

Veni G draws a parallel with the days of the murdered prime minister Andrey Lukanov (BUL):

Georgi Stoev’s murder reminded me of something I would rather like to forget. Younger people don’t know and the older don’t remember, but at the end of 1995 I publicly attacked the bright personality of Andrey Lukanov. In an interview for Free Europe I said that this person blackmailed me with a record of service and threatened me with an assault. I also said that he was the father of the “moutri” mob groups, of the bat-wielders. The “Great.” The future champion for truth Koritarov [a renowned TV journalist] censured my interview (it was on tape) and attributed that to the fact that he had no arguments to support my claims. Georgi Stoev brought the connection between BSP and the (organised) crime to light. And he got shot. Guess who did that? It’s not difficult. After Stoev’s disclosures about Gen. Lyuben Gocev, the latter said between his teeth “let him take his disclosures in the grave.” Well, the general’s order was obeyed. And me, generals, what do you plan for me?” [Gocev is a retired Secret Service general, who is, according to the murdered Stoev, the “eminence grise” of the ruling Bulgarian Socialist Party and its connection with the mafia. Gocev was a minister of foreign affairs in the 1990s.]

The scandal spilled beyond the Bulgarian boundaries and attracted the attention of the European media.
In this connection Realpolitik writes (BUL):

To support our statements that Rumen Petkov is dangerous to the national security, in the foreign media and then in the Bulgarian ones, there appeared the information that, according to data from DANS (the National Security Agency), substantial profit has been made from (illegal) drug trafficking, and part of the money has been used to finance Hizbullah, Islamic Jihad and the Christian militias. The biggest quantity of illegal drugs has been exported via the border checkpoints Kapitan Andreevo, Lesovo and Kalotina. The illegal business revenues have been laundered through a chain of bureaux de change at home or international money transfer offices. The sharp drop in the number of arrests, related to the production of synthetic drugs, has been attributed in the report to a leak in the interior ministry.

However, despite popular pressure, minister Petkov was still unwilling to resign. He declared that he would sue the media and the German investigative journalist Juergen Roth for libel. On April 6, the parliamentary internal order and security commission approved its report on the case, in which it notes that the meetings of Rumen Petkov with the Galevis were illegal, but did not recommend a replacement of the minister. And at the meeting of the ruling coalition (between BSP , MRF and NMSP ) it was decided that there would be no reshuffles in the interior ministry. Petkov himself said that he would resign, only not under “media pressure” but when decided. The people could not believe it and were in dismay at what was happening.

Radan Kanev writes (BUL):

The tripartite coalition was prone in front of Petkov, thus taking full responsibility for his outrageous actions. The question is WHY? And the answer is simple […] - because Rumen Petkov is an election campaigner and a treasurer to the BSP and president […] Parvanov. Because the head of state – a champion and father of the coalition – has already taken the responsibility for the actions of his associate.

In his blog, Konstantin Pavlov comments on the information published in the media (BUL):

“He [Rumen Petkov] did not do operative doings with the Galevis. He was rather accosting them in connection to forthcoming elections. There is no other reason that could make him meet (them), because he is not a fool. He knows that such a meeting could never remain secret.”

This can be read in an article in the Vseki Den publication. In fact, it looks like it was all about the commonplace vote-buying :). Relax, everybody, he wasn’t selling drugs in a kindergarten, right? And why this modesty – “for elections.” Let him tell which elections we are talking about here. Could not these be the elections for a “social welfare president” (Parvanov’s campaign slogan).

In protest, many bloggers placed a red dot on their blogs, symbolizing a red traffic light to the developments in the country.

The Sign of the Protest
The protest slogan: “Red light for the mafia in the country”

Thanks to the bloggers’ efforts, the public was informed about the protest on April 11, organized by Civil Initiative Justice under the slogan “The people against the mafia.”

The Protest against Minister Rumen Petkov 2
The Protest against Minister Rumen Petkov
The Protest against Minister Rumen Petkov 4
Pictures: Konstantin Pavlov CC 3.0

During the event, the organizers took a stand against the use of the protest for political ends and declared themselves against all public officials connected with the mafia. The demonstration was not numerous, which testifies to what extent people have lost faith. Although unhappy with the situation, they see no alternatives and trust no more promises. The opposition is weak and divided, and in the past the accusations Rumen Petkov faces today had been directed at its own leaders.

In this connection Veni G writes(BUL):

“At yesterday’s protest against the mafia state there hardly came some 200 people. Several tens of thousands turn out at similar protest in Spain. If we divide 500,000 - okay, let’s say 200,000 - by 200 the result will be the years it will take to for us to mature to measure up to the civil conscience of the Spaniards. Too long? A whole generation was sacrificed for the transition [in 1989], now it turns out that the next to generations are losers as well. Huh?”

And just as we were expecting that the things are to go from bad to worse, the news broke that on April 13 Rumen Petkov resigned. No kidding this time.

Borislav Tsekov thinks (BUL) that the reason for this is the “pressure, exerted by Simeon Saxecoburggotski and NMSP on [the prime minister] Stanishev and [MRF leader] Dogan to remove the leadership of the ministry with mafia ties.”

Probably the fact that during the last no-confidence vote on April 11, NMSP abstained and did not support its coalition partners, really has something to do with the withdrawal of the minister. NMSP indeed lost a lot in terms of voters’ support, after entering the power with MRF and BSP and is now trying to recover at least some of its former positions. However, even Petkov’s resignation cannot make people believe that the situation will change in Bulgaria.

Nikolay Pavlov writes in his blog Black station (BUL):

These days there is mayhem in the blogosphere: every other post is “Rumen Petkov resigned,” “The Match Lighter in gone,” toasts, enthusiasm. If extraterrestrials had landed in front of the National Palace of Culture, they would not have received so much attention. Well, I am not going to write about that. I see no point. I am more interested in where we have brought ourselves to, when the replacement of a totally failed minister (a totally routine procedure in the civilised world) should be welcomed in our country as the resurrection of Christ. To what extent have we accepted lawlessness and political impertinence as normal and unavoidable, that a belated denouement elated us so much.

Hurray, at last one of them got what he deserved, he got stuck in shit up to the ears and he had “his resignation tendered.” He would never do that himself, not without “an offer he can’t help but accept.” Do you remember “The Godfather”? If you don’t remember it, then you surely remember another Rumen – Rumen Ovcharov [the former minister of economy and energy, who also resigned after a political scandal]. The poor soul was first reduced in rank to a chairman of a parliamentary commission, and then was appointed to “finish through” “BulgarTabak” [Bulgaria's largest tobacco company]. The Match Lighter is no less “Rumen” than Rumen Ovcharov, you can be sure. He sure sold his head dearly.

As the journalist Todor Tokin said last night on Boyko Stankushev’s show – “a communist never resigns; he is transferred to a new position.” Nothing new under the sun. It’s only the code names that change in an unyielding operatively interesting scheme.”

His words turned out to be prophetical. A few days later Rumen Petkov was appointed to “be responsible for the personnel restructuring that is to take place in the government.”

Ivan Bedrov comments (BUL):

Now everybody who previously did not know that at Pozitano (BSP headquarters) Rumen Petkov is known as “the Boss,” surely knows who is at the head of the red parade. And if he finds some time to spare after the meetings with the Galevis or Madjo, he might give some attention to Sergey. And do a bit of cabinet reshuffling for him.”

The subsequent comments on the cabinet reshuffle are not favourable at all. Ivan Bedrov notes (BUL): “The prime minister did not even try to rearrange the graveyard. He just replaced the carnations with chrysanthemums.”

Meanwhile, the “minister's resignation” short story contest has ended. Ninety-four stories were submitted. The strangest thing is that in the winning story (BUL) Rumen Petkov does not resign, although everyone pleads with him to do that. And Peyo notes (BUL) that “nobody's imagination can match the reality.”

In a poll published on his blog, Ivan Bedrov asks: “How will things (in Bulgaria) get right?” The largest group of respondents (35 percent) are of the opinion that “things are not going to get right.”

And Konstantin Pavlov writes in another post (BUL):

“I am more and more in favor of the URGENT ABOLITION of the nation state as an institution that protects my interest…”

0 comments · »»

April 10th, 2008

Bulgaria, Macedonia: Blog Wars Over History 

Yavor Mihaylov · 15:37 · Eastern & Central Europe
lingua → mk · es

The relations between Bulgaria and Macedonia are no less complex and incomprehensible than those between Greece and Macedonia, although lately the former get less media exposure than the latter. The main problem between Sofia and Skopje is, once again, history.

To Bulgarians, the Macedonians were part of the Bulgarian nation until the beginning of the 20th century, when a large part of Macedonia fell under Serbian domination after the Balkan wars. Then, due to Serbia’s policy in the region and the doctrine of Macedonism, changes in the mindset of the local population occurred, leading to the forming of the Macedonian nation. The Comintern and Stalin’s stance on the issue also contributed to this result.

Macedonians, on the other hand, consider themselves an entirely separate nation, heir to an ancient people. They accuse their Bulgarian neighbours of having been an occupation power in their land and claim that Sofia is trying to appropriate parts of the history of Macedonia, like, for instance, King Samuil, St. Kliment Okhridski, the revolutionary Gotze Delchev, etc.

Bulgarians address similar accusations to Macedonia.

Contention is even further exacerbated by fears on the part of Macedonia that Sofia seeks to “assimilate” the Macedonians, while Bulgarians suspect their neighbours in seeking to annex Pirin region, which is part of the so-called Greater Macedonia.

All these contradictions have spilled over into the virtual space and sparked a permanent “war” over history between Bulgarian and Macedonian bloggers – a war that often exceeds the rules of “bon ton.” And the Bulgarian blogosphere, too, is debating the question of what should be Bulgaria's attitude towards Macedonia.

Blogger Peter Stoykov writes (BUL):

Some arguments about whether Macedonia is or has been part of Bulgaria, whether there exist a Macedonian language, nationality, the Macedonian question, and Bulgarian national interest in Macedonia… Historians, politicians and, most of all, internet morons are competing in speaking nonsense on the issue, as though their lives depend on that.

[…]

Is Macedonia Bulgarian?

No, it is not Bulgarian, it’s Macedonian. And I will tell you why, but I will first look back in time. In 2001, a regular census took place in Australia. Precisely then a Star Wars episode was released and as you know, there are many people crazy about this film. So, in the “Ethnicity” box in the census questionnaire some wisecracks wrote “Jedi”… […] What does this have to do with Macedonia? If Macedonians want to call themselves Macedonians, they have an indisputable right to do so.

[…]

So, what shall we do with the Macedonian question?

As a matter of fact, I am even glad that Macedonia is not part of Bulgaria and that a number of years ago it was torn away from Bulgaria and given over to Yugoslavia. Bulgaria, as our politicians have always been happy to say, “is a focus of stability on the Balkans” – unrest is boiling around us, there were fights and fission in Yugoslavia, Kosovo has been on the table, the Greeks fought with the Turks over Cyprus, Turks are fighting the Kurds, they have even crossed over the border into Iraq, five years ago Albanians made something which was very close to a revolution in Macedonia, fire was exchanged there.

If Macedonia were part of Bulgaria, we would be part of this madness.

Another renowned blogger, Peter Dobrev, responds (BUL):

“Macedonia is the cradle of the Bulgarian national spirit. And even if it is to become its grave, we will never give up the fight for its liberation.” This was the title with which the then large-circulation Outro newspaper appeared on the eve of the Balkan war. This used to be the dominant opinion until 1944 (when the communists took the power in Bulgaria). Today, however, regardless of the fact that Bulgaria in theory should have left the ideological constructs of totalitarianism, the memory of Macedonia has faded so much that it turns into polar extremes.

[…]

No wonder then that blogger Peter Stoykov thinks that there is no Macedonian question, that Macedonia is Macedonian, and whoever says the opposite is “an internet moron.”

[…]

Everybody has a God-given right of self-determination – as a Jedi, Eskimo or Macedonian. When, however, it’s a matter of general national significance, of causes that have cost the lives of thousands and matters that have changed the fate of a half of a people, it’s good to speak with a little understanding and knowledge. It’s necessary to separate personal opinion from the objective historical fact…

[…]

Just as everybody knows today that Alexander the Great was a Greek, so it is indisputable that all leaders of the Macedonian organisations after 1878 (the year of the Berlin congress and the subsequent liberation/emancipation of Bulgaria) were Bulgarians. These leaders, as well as the people as a whole, have always spoken of themselves as Bulgarians, and they have been seen as such by the foreign observers. All foreign observers, even the Serbian ones.

These two opinions sum up the main social attitudes in relation to Macedonia. The majority of Bulgarians have no claims to its neighbour, nor do they want to interfere in its domestic affairs, but many are irritated by the Macedonian blackmail to give up a part of their history and want the historic truth established. Similar voices are heard in Macedonia.

In the thick of one of the battles between Bulgarian and Macedonian bloggers, Macedonian blogger Ivica Anteski wrote in his ANTIblog (MKD):

If the Bulgarian and the Macedonian “truths” do not coincide, this means that they are not true (or at least one of them). Simple logic. And in court, when two eyewitnesses make contradicting testimonies, the case is solved by means of a confrontation. But historians don’t want to confront each other. It’s more likely that we, bloggers, slaughter ourselves first on the internet, than see the experts surpass the contentions through the power of arguments.

[…]

Scholars, historians, philologists, academics, Slavic studies experts (Macedonian and Bulgarian)!!! Sit down together and tell us where the problem is. Reach an understanding! Forget that you are Macedonian or Bulgarian – scholars have no nationality. The truth and the facts are their nationality. Clear out the problems.

In such an atmosphere, on March 31, several days before the NATO summit in Bucharest, Sofia-based Manfred Woerner Foundation and the Atlantic Club of Bulgaria introduced a brochure titled “Bulgarian Policies on the Republic of Macedonia,” which was written by a group of Bulgarian history, Balkan studies and diplomacy scholars.

Bulgarian policies on the Republic of Macedonia
Image: komitata.blogspot.com (CC 3.0)

The purpose of the publication is to be used in the process of defining Bulgaria's Macedonia-related policies. Blogger Konstantin Pavlov, who attended the presentation, published the following report (BUL):

The Republic of Macedonia is about to join the EU and NATO. When exactly this will happen is not clear yet. The problem lies in the fact that, on the basis of the argument between Greece and Macedonia, the majority of independent politicians and observers take the side of Macedonia, without giving it much thought. (David against Goliath). And although the argument over the name elicits sympathy for Macedonia, the arguments that are being used – ancient Macedonia, that has survived down to the present day, the “autochtonal” Macedonian population, having been “enslaved” and “assimilated” by its bad neighbours, including the “bad Bulgarians,” gains ground with the people who sympathize with Macedonia. Those sympathies might lead to extremely negative consequences for Bulgaria, like, for example, “giving up” [May 24 as a national holiday] […]. It seems the book on the subject is not bad (I had no nerve to read it) and, unfortunately, is written in a complex, pseudo-scientific language with the purposes not all too clear. The result is nearly contrary to the objective sought – to write a clear, concise and unequivocally logical (right, winning) policy of the Bulgarian state towards the challenges coming from Macedonia. Well, it has not been achieved very well.

Having read the book and Pavlov’s report, Macedonian blogger Volan wrote (MKD):

The desire of Bulgarian politics – one people – two nations – is clearly discernible…

It is clear that the problems between Skopje and Sofia cannot be solved until the Balkan approach to history as property is not given up, and as long as it is being divided to “mine” and “yours” – in this case, into “Macedonian” and “Bulgarian.”

30 comments · »»

April 4th, 2008

Bulgaria: What Can Force a Minister to Resign? 

Yavor Mihaylov · 01:07 · Eastern & Central Europe
lingua → mk · bn · sq · es

On March 18, Ivan Ivanov, deputy director of Bulgaria's special division for combating organized crime (GDBOP), was arrested on charges of corruption and contacts with organized crime groups. The affair flaired up following a hearing of the former GDBOP director Vanyo Tanov before the parliamentary Commission of Internal security and Public Order.

In the course of the hearing it emerged that the minister of the interior Rumen Petkov had also had “unregulated meetings” with alleged members of criminal groups. Minister Petkov dismissed Tanov’s statements as “a bunch of lies.” Later on it became clear, however, that such meetings had indeed taken place.

The inadequate and rude behavior of the minister of the interior at a news conference on March 19 caused widespread indignation. The national TV stations did not air the outrageous footage from the news conference, but it was uploaded on YouTube.com by a journalist who had attended the event.

It was also published on Ivan Bedrov’s blog. The renowned journalist and blogger Bedrov wonders (BUL) whether the minister could have been “high” at the conference.

The public was shocked by the disclosures. Calls on the minister to resign spread on the internet, but for the time being he refuses to tender his resignation.

In this relation, Yovko Lambrev asks (BUL) what else has to happen in the Ministry of Interior and in Bulgaria before we “start kicking out the bad eggs, bad cops and bad governments where they belong …over the board…”

Julian Popov writes (BUL):

One could start a funny business in this country. One could open offices and start taking bets whether Rumen Petkov will go or stay. Whether he will be sacked or not. Whether he will be transfered to a new job or not. Or one could take bets on what is still to happen will actually happen. In a week, month, six months or a year? It is clear to everybody that Rumen Petkov is a grave liability both in the balances of his cabinet and his party [the ruling Bulgarian Socialist Party]. However, it is exciting to place bets on when something which is obvious to everybody will become a real denouement. When he actually resigns, work on the definition of a “Petkov quotient” could start. This quotient will measure the time taken to admit in public a truth that is obvious to everybody.

Peyo Popov writes (BUL):

Lately I’ve been feeling like my days are empty if there weren’t a recorded news conference of Rumen Petkov. When I am lucky I watch and laugh in frenzy at taglines like “your bloodthirstiness does not inspire me.” But it is not the vulgarity of the minister that amazes me.”

The blogger admits there is a question he cannot figure out for himself:

What has to happen so that we could see a minister tender his resignation?

This difficult question, still unanswered, inspired Peyo to launch (BUL) a literary contest in the hope that “there should exist in Bulgaria a mind capable in their ingenuity to perceive a series of … events (leading to such a resignation), should it not?”

The participants in the contest are required to write a short story, describing events leading to a minister tendering his/her resignation and to send the text file or a link to the story. The blogger is fundraising for an award for the winner in the contest.

It may seem incredible, but numerous bloggers have already contributed to the award fund and the renowned local blogger Bogomil Shopov has promised that he will make a movie based on the winning story. Nineteen short stories have already been submitted and more are likely to come before the deadline on April 8, while the public is discussing who the winner will be and whether some of the scenarios could come true.

3 comments · »»

April 2nd, 2008

Bulgaria: Rethinking History - A National Holiday in Days of Tragedy 

Yavor Mihaylov · 21:55 · Eastern & Central Europe
lingua → es

On March 3, Bulgaria celebrates its biggest national holiday. On this date the Treaty of San Stefano between Russia and the Ottoman Empire was signed, concluding the Russo-Turkish War of 1877–78 that put an end to the Ottoman presence in Bulgaria. However, like a number of historical events, this date has been subject to rethinking after the collapse of communism.

A renowned journalist and blogger Ivo Berov writes in his blog (BUL):

There is no such national holiday in the world. A day on which a people celebrates the victory of a foreign army, admitting its incapacity to liberate itself and do something heroic. And on this day, bookmarked as a national holiday, the Bulgarians have to declare: “We are proud that the Russian army liberated us.” Only there is no such pride. Not in the rest of the world. There is only humiliation.

[…]

In vain will all media sing praises to a veteran KGB agent, who can be a representative of anything else but the Russian tsarist armies and Alexander II – the Tsar Liberator of Bulgaria.

The majority of the Bulgarians, however, never give thought to these questions and instead they just celebrate.

This year, though, a tragic event cast a shadow on the celebrations and kindled even more the discussion about the emblematic date. On the night of Feb. 28, a fire started aboard an overnight train from Kardam to Sofia. Nine people lost their lives in the disaster. The majority of Bulgarians thought that a national mourning must be declared, but the authorities postponed it until after the national holiday celebrations. Georgi Grancharov wrote (BUL) in his blog:

I don’t feel like writing. Although I wanted to. I had such ideas buzzing in my head… Everything went away with the morning papers. And with the news, impressions and events from the recent days.
I was to celebrate the national holiday. I was to write about my visit to the Museum of Military History, I was to… I don’t remember what. Everything is now drowned in the unreal nightmare, from which there stand out the horrifying photographs of burned carriages, weeping people, unbearable pain and the shadow of a prodigal raped state that does not remember where it came from and does not know where it is heading.

Suspicions grew that employees of the Bulgarian State Railways had reacted inadequately and could thus be responsible for the spreading of the fire and the high death toll, as it emerged that the carriage doors remained locked during the tragic accident. A number of people supposed that the cause could be a technical flaw overlooked in the course of technical checks. Radan Kanev writes (BUL) in his blog, The Reformist Diaries:

I will not write about the causes of the fire and respectively – the options to undertake legal action in relation with it. Prior to the conclusions of the expert commissions, all hypothesizing is just intellectual antics of dubious value. The question of amenability is premature.

It appears, however – and beyond doubt at that - that the deaths were due to the locked carriage doors. That’s how the Bulgarian State Railways solve the problem with burglaries and “fare evaders” – by means of locking up the carriages…

It is also certain beyond any doubt that when Daniel’s [Daniel Vichev, one of the victims] friends undertook a search to find him in the evening of March 1 – the police at Cherven Bryag [near the crash site] refused to cooperate with them because the area of the search was in the jurisdiction of the Lukovit police. The police in Lukovit [also near the crash site] informed the search team that they had a single patrol car, which was being used for the needs of the town, and that they had no … flashlights.

At the Civil Defense branch in Pleven, they were told that they could not take part in the search, because “they have no order from the prosecutor’s office.” This last thing is a blatant lie – prosecutors do not carry out searches, and Civil Defense does not conduct legal proceedings.

Locked doors…

Friends and relatives to Daniel Vicev, one of the victims, have launched a blog, in which they insisted that the truth about the disaster must be established (BUL):

If we want to find the people to blame, if we want to take action to preclude the existence of killer trains, if we want to find out what the last minutes of the nine burnt victims were, help us find eyewitnesses and make a simulation of the fire and the ensuing actions of the passengers and the railway employees.

[…]

To remember and not let this ever happen again. We have to know the truth, so that we could find the ones to blame. We are counting on you!

The public was further outraged when a small provincial newspaper wrote that the president Georgi Parvanov went hunting in the days following the disaster. The article would have probably gone unnoticed if several renowned bloggers had not published parts of it. In this relation another popular blogger and journalist, Simion Pateev wrote (BUL) in his blog, Nabludatel:

Do the public figures have the responsibility to be role models for the society? Yes, they do, because as a rule every society emulates its leaders. If they are no good, then the society will be no good. President Georgi Parvanov was a good role model for Bulgarians. He was vehemently celebrating the “fatherland” holiday, toying with nationalism in days of crisis, when we found out that prior to that the president went hunting foxes and wolves in utmost secrecy. Meanwhile, people in the morgue were trying to somehow ascertain the precise number of the victims of the fire on the Kardam-Sofia train, using the remains of pieces of bones?! It was also a mistake that not one of the “grand” statesmen went to the site of the tragedy, leaving the people guessing and spawning rumours.

Konstantin Pavlov sums it all up in his blog (BUL):

Frankly, I would prefer a national mourning to such “celebrations” to commemorate March 3.

0 comments · »»

March 31st, 2008

Bulgaria: Against Internet “Bugging” 

Yavor Mihaylov · 22:27 · Eastern & Central Europe
lingua → mk · mg · es

On Jan. 30, the Bulgarian government promulgated Decree 40, which, among other things, allows the security services to gather from each internet user the data about who they have written to, who is on their contact lists, what instant communication agents they are equipped with, when they used them and the precise manner of using them. Institutions attributed the act to the requirements of Directive 2006/24/EC, but the majority of internet users in Bulgaria interpreted it as an encroachment on their civil liberties.

The civil initiative Electronic Frontier published on the internet a petition (BUL) against the decree, signed by over 1150 people already, and a number of Bulgarian bloggers put banners to support the campaign on their blogs.

On Feb. 7, Electronic Frontier organized a protest in front of the State Agency for Information Technologies and Communications (SAITC) in Sofia, the capital of Bulgaria.


“Those who trade freedom for security, lose both.”
Photo by www.nabludatel.info

According to blogger Bogomil Shopov, the protest's chief organizer, the event, even though not massive, sparked a lot of reactions from the press, TV and radio stations, and more than 4,000 websites.

On Feb. 23, a meeting of bloggers, online journalists, free-thinking people with an opinion of their own, and enthusiasts united by the idea of blogging, was held in Sofia. The discussions were focused on the Decree 40. Officials had been invited but none of them showed up. Many bloggers published reports from the event. Nelly Ognyanova, a renowned blogger and professor of media law wrote on her blog (BUL):

There will be no press release from BlogCamp, but the discussion on the Decree 40 of SAITC and the Ministry of the Interior was rather a discussion on the gradual loss of freedom. This issue is important and deserves to be delved in separately: the loss of freedom in small steps.

About this act in particular: there already exist sufficient means of surveillance and wiretapping, and the ministry of the interior already has the technical capabilities to trace messages. Decree 40 contains limitations to a constitutional right – and each and every time any limitations of the rights become an issue, the legislator has to make a judgment whether the balance between limitations and guarantees has been observed.

The constitution stipulates that such judgments are made in the parliament. In this case, the judgment has been made by the heads of two government institutions. This is a sufficient reason to challenge Decree 40. […]

On March 10, a group of bloggers, members of Electronic Frontier and Open Project Foundation, filed a complaint with the National Ombudsman, Mr. Guinyo Ganev - a complaint concerning their misgivings that the Decree runs counter to a number of civil rights enshrined in the Constitution and other principal acts, with an appeal for an examination. Nine days later, the ombudsman attended a discussion of the issue, which drew about 70 more people (plus the media).

Bogomil Shopov briefly reports (BUL) on the event in his blog:

Yesterday, there was a useful discussion on the encroachment on civil rights in Decree 40 and other regulations. The discussion was aimed not only at discussing the particular act of SAITC and the Ministry of Interior, but also at a debate on where the thin border between freedom and security passes.

Bogomil Shopov, a representative of Electronic Frontier, spoke about civil rights, the trust in the state and the institutions, the fears of the users and the widespread understanding that “in order to have freedom, indeed we have to have security, but this is neither the way, nor the principle” to achieve this. The official response wasn't too satisfactory:

An SAITC official offered an outline of the viewpoint of the Agency that has been the implementer but not the author of the decree. The familiar excuses followed – the obligations with the EU, the Directives…

Mr. Guenov, an advisor to interior minister Rumen Petkov, filled up his time with general talk. According to Shopov, he said that they (the interior ministry) “are still being instructed on these issues?!?”

On the positive side, Electronic Frontier has been offered to start working on a draft law regulating the issue, and the ombudsman is still at the outset of his examinations, writes Shopov.

He concludes:

For me, the task of raising awareness of the issue has already been solved. Now it’s the turn of other tasks.

8 comments · »»

Funders
Sponsors
Korea content
supported by
OutBlaze Japan content
supported by
SanrioTown