July 5th, 2008
This will be our first attempt to cover the Sahrawi blogsphere. I, alongside Jillian York and Renata Avila will try to shed light on what the Sahrawi bloggers are saying each week, in Arabic, English and Spanish. The topic of Western Sahara is one of a very complex background, and emotions tend to run high whenever it is under discussion. We will try to cover the Sahrawi side with as much objectivity as it is humanly possible.
This week's pick comes from the Western Sahara blog, writing about the new Sahrawi satellite TV station, R.A.S.D. TV (Democratic Sahrawi Arab Republic Television):
لا أخفيكم سرا كم انتظرت شخصيا كما الكثيرين بالمناطق المحتلة خروج هذا المولود الجديد الى النور بعد طول انتظار، نعم أخيرا لنا تلفزاتنا الفضائية
I have to tell you how much I've personally waited, like many others in the occupied areas, for this newborn baby to see light. And after a long wait, yes, we now have our own satellite television station.
The blogger says that the most important mission for the station should be to advance the Sahrawi case among other Arab countries:
لعل أهم دور لها آن تعرف بالقضية الوطنية لأخوتنا العرب في ظل صمت الجامعة العربية والذي نتمنى أن تتمكن القناة من كسر جدار الصمت هذا وان تجعل منها منتدى للنقاش البناء وللتفاعل مع الأشقاء العرب ، وهو اكبر تحدي للتلفزة نظرا لامتناع المسؤوليين عن الأقمار الصناعية العربية عن إعطاء تردد لها.
The most important role [for the station] is to shed light on our national cause to our Arab brothers. As the Arab League has remained silent over the issue, we hope the station will be able to break this silence barrier and to be a forum for constructive and interactive discussion with our Arab brothers, which will be the biggest challenge facing the channel, considering that the officials at the Arab TV Satellites have refused to host the channel on their frequencies.
He adds:
وأخيرا نتمنى أن تميط القناة اللثام عن واقع المناطق المحتلة من خلال بث أشرطة متلفزة تظهر فيها الصحراء الغربية من الداخل وان تؤرخ هذه الحقبة والمنعطف الهام في مسيرة قضيتنا الوطنية العادلة،
And finally, we hope the channel will also uncover the realities in the occupied areas by airing footage showing the Sahara from the inside, and to document this era and this important juncture in the history of our just national cause.
11 comments · »»May 18th, 2008
As the Lebanese leaders go to Doha, Qatar, to resume their “National Dialogue”, here is a roundup of what Syrian bloggers had to say on the latest crisis in Lebanon.
The crisis which was sparked by the 2 controversial government decisions aimed against the opposition, and especially against Hizbulla, and the swift response by Hizbulla with civil disobedience that developed into a military operation that put Hizbulla in control of Beirut in two days, and left 100 people dead. All of this coupled with political tension accumulating for more than two years, and the threat of a sectarian strife, brought back to the Lebanese to the horrid memories of their civil war.
The Syrian bloggers were as divided as their counterparts in Lebanon about who is to blame for this latest crisis, and what must be done to avoid such events in the future.
We start with Ayman's post titled “Rai” or “Opinion” [Ar]:
لقد آلمني كثيراً أن يستعمل حزب الله سلاحه في صراع سياسي داخلي، وأن أرى صور المسلحين الملثمين في شوارع بيروت من جديد. لكني لا أستطيع أن أخفي شماتتي لانكسار شوكة جماعة 14 آذار.
[…]
إن بلداً كلبنان يستحق أكثر من أن يكون دمية بيد الخارج، ويستحق حكاماً أفضل من مجرمي الحرب الذين على رأس السلطة الآن.
It was truly painful to me to see Hizbulla using its arms in an internal political conflict, and to see pictures of masked gunmen in the streets of Beirut again. But I can't hide my joy for having them broken the thorn of the forces of March 14.
[…]
A country like Lebanon deserves a lot more than to be just a puppet for foreign powers, and it deserves better leaders than the war criminals who are in power now.
This is how Sasa started his coverage of the events:
There's not much I can add. It's a mess, and as usual, it's a mess of Lebanon's creating.
Hizbollah is to blame for starting this civil violence. March 14 is to blame for letting this political crisis fester for 18 months.
Wassim of Maysaloon, writes about what he perceives as the “Liberation of Beirut“:
After so much talk, so much posturing and so much thuggery in the end it took only 24 hours for Beirut to be liberated. Let me come out clean from the start, those men who flushed out the Future movement and surrounded Jumblatt are clean men, strong men and, I feel, the most honourable men in the region.
While Abu Kareem of the Levantine Dreamhouse, makes his case against Hizbulla's military action, and says “Hizb Should Disband its Militia“:
I have little sympathy for most of the March 14 politicians but my anger today is directed squarely at Hizbullah and Nasrallah. Many of us, because Hizbullah managed to deliver a black eye to the Israeli army in the summer of 2006, seem to be willing to overlook their transgressions or question their political motives. But I cannot escape the fact that, no matter how you slice it, the presence of an independent militia, armed to the teeth, that is accountable to no one is an unsustainable and destabilizing situation in a sovereign state. The repeated claims, that the arms are only for protection against Israel, ring hollow, especially in the last twenty four hours with Nasrallah’s bombastic threats of civil war if he does not get his way.
Over at Joshua Landis‘ Syria Comment, he writes on Rex Brynen's (of McGill University) argument that Hizbullah has blundered, saying:
He is correct that the Shiite move on Sunni West Beirut has exacerbated sectarian anxieties and fears - not only Sunni fears, but Christian fears as well. Lebanon's other sects now realize how little stands between them and Hizbullah's militia.
Second, Sunnis such as Salim al-Hoss and Najib Mikati who would be expected to lead Lebanon in a compromise and who have showed themselves in the past to be willing to work with Syria even at the most trying of times, have taken an anti-Hizbullah line.
Also at Syria Comment, Qifa Nabki, presents a comprehensive analysis of what happened in Lebanon in the last few years, and how that culminated in last weeks crisis:
It is tempting to regard the political stalemate that has gripped Lebanon for the past seventeen months – with all of its futile spats and squabbles, accusations and recriminations – as yet another example of the mundane and self-destructive charade of Lebanese democracy. The level of discourse among the political elite has fallen so low that it is often scarcely distinguishable from the sloganeering of propagandists and the taunts of schoolyard bullies.
And last but not least, Razan reports on one largely forgotten victim in this conflict, Syrian workers in Lebanon:
1 comment · »»This is something that will not be mentioned in the media of March 14 or in the media of the opposition because both could care less about the plight of Syrian workers in Lebanon. Today, Hariri militia men in the North stopped a bus carrying Syrian workers and shot at them.
April 26th, 2008
Yesterday, the CIA released footage of an alleged Syrian North-Korean-built nuclear reactor. The footage “exploded” all over the news.
The story started with an Israel air strike on an unknown target in the Syrian northern desert in September 2007. Speculations about a possible nuclear cooperation between Syria and North Korea has been floating since then. But both Israel and the US have kept an official policy of secrecy over the target, until yesterday.
Syrian officials have repeatedly denied the allegations. And the IAEA was highly critical of the US and Israel for concealing the information until now, and for referring to force before giving the UN a chance to confirm the information.
Syrian bloggers have been very skeptical about the contents of the footage, almost everybody still remembers the confidence with which Collin Powell briefed the UN about Iraq's never-to-be-found WMDs.
Joshua Landis rounds up media reactions on the footage, and comments on America's “Shoot-first-and-ask-questions-later” policy.
The second criticism of the CIA's effort was to argue that Washington should not be encouraging Israel to launch bombing raids without first going through legal channels, international agencies, and peaceful alternatives. Shoot-first-and-ask-questions-later policies are sure to undermine US legitimacy in the eyes of the international community. They will do nothing to dispel Arab anger at US and Israeli arrogance. On the contrary, the propensity to use force as a first option will convince others to do the same.
Sasa from The Syria News Wire, tries to put the accusations in their international context, and wonders why did they wait this long to release such “important” information.
There's nothing new here. These accusations were leveled when Israel destroyed a building in Syria with an air raid last September. Now the US has produced photographic ‘evidence' and given it to the UN nuclear agency. But they're not happy - the IAEA is furious at the delay in handing these photos over.
So why the delay? Look at the timing. It comes on the day America is about to finish negotiating with North Korea. And it comes two days after Israel revealed it was willing to return the whole Occupied Golan Heights in return for a peace treaty with Syria.
And finally, we stop at Ihsan's, where he also seems highly skeptical of any concrete facts behind the allegations, but raises another issue: Whatever is the purpose of that building, we seem to have a case of high treason. “Have some heads rolled in Damascus over this or not?” he asks.
3 comments · »»The photos were not just taken from a satellite; in fact, the most compelling photos were taking from within, outside, and few meters away from the building and during different phases of its construction. Whoever took them was available on site and did not just sneak some peaks from afar. The alleged extreme secrecy surrounding the “project” would naturally suggest extreme security measures and “no cameras allowed” signs all over the place. Yet, the person(s) took the shots was pretty comfortable judging from the angles of the photos. This means one of two things, it has never been a top secret covert location as claimed and anyone could get there, or the presence of a huge fat rat among or a friend of the elite and most trusty people who were in charge of it. I, however, lean toward the latter.
April 22nd, 2008
Abd from Syria Winks takes us on a photo tour in the ancient city of Safita, and its crusader tower, Chastel Blanc.
April 21st, 2008
Wouldn't you hate it if someone waited for you to go pray, to steal your… chocolates?! Kinan from Jar of Juice, shares his “bitter” experience with a co-worker.
April 20th, 2008
Damascus prides itself on being the oldest continuously inhabited city in the world. The history of Damascus goes back well into 8000 BC. In every corner of its ancient alleys there's a taste of every historical era there was to be found. The city that had withstood everything from earthquakes to invasions for nearly 10 millennia, is now crumbling under the threat of… “Modernism“!
Sasa from the Syria News Wire, compiled a series of posts about the situation of the old city of Damascus, and the efforts taking place for the protection and conservation of the city.
Part one of the series deals with last year's plan to tear down the ancient neighborhood of Al-Amara in order to widen the roads outside the walls of the old city. The plan caused an outrage among Syrians, and protests were organized everywhere until they were quietly dropped, for now.
Shopkeepers were furious at the plans, a Facebook and Blogger campaign was launched. That led to a petition. And eventually journalists got wind of the proposals and it made the international news. Then the bombshell - just months before Damascus began its year as Arab Capital of Culture, UNESCO threatened to withdraw Damascus's World Heritage Site status unless more is done to protect the Old City.

Bab al-Faradis, al-Amara, Damascus
The second part is dedicated to the conservation works down in Medhat Pasha street (Street Called Straight), the longest and one of the oldest roads in old Damascus. Sasa aknowledges the importance of the this project as the street has been in shackles for a long time, but laments the ill-planning and the indiscriminate replacement of culturally important parts of the ancient market, like the old Ottoman-time roof, that has a special significance which he explains:
The tin roofs over Medhat Pasha and Souq Al-Hamidiyeh date from the Ottoman refurbishment of the main Souqs. During the insurgency against the French occupation, they were punctured by gunfire. And they've remained that way for almost one hundred years. The shafts of sunlight which pierce into the dark souqs are blindingly beautiful, and a daily reminder of Syria's struggle for independence.
But the centuries-old black Medhat Pasha roof, which was decorated by history, has been replaced by a new white one.

Medhat Pasha Street (Street Called Straight), with its ancient tin roof.
Part three, takes us on an open ended ride into the ancient quarter of Saroujah, a neighborhood that had witnessed some destruction in the past to make space for character-less apartment blocks. The plans to bulldoze the rest of the neighborhood were put on hold, and the decision to go through with them or not is to be taken by the end of this year, says Sasa:
But recently, the organisation which looks after the Old City - and works well with the European Union to do it - has taken over responsibility for Saroujah. So is a change in Saroujah's fortunes in store?
In the past few months, they have re-paved part of the area (with far less inconvenience than in Medhat Pasha).
So does this mean destruction is no longer on the cards?
Documents released by the Old City modernisation authorities show that they are going to make a decision on the future of Saroujah by the end of this year.

Sarouja, Damascus
As the grip of the new corporate culture tightens around the old city, it seems the only way to saving it are the efforts of the civil society, and it has succeeded in reverting the disastrous plans in al-Amara, so there might still be hope at the end of the tunnel.
Photos courtesy of Sasa.
3 comments · »»April 15th, 2008
“As Israel prepares to celebrate its sixtieth anniversary, and as Palestinians reach sixty years of dispossession, we must honor the memory of those who perished in the savage butchery that was the Deir Yasin massacre of April 9, 1948,” writes Rime Allaf, who commemorates the 60th anniversary of the massacre.
Joshua Landis brings us media reports about a planned meeting between former US president Jimmy Carter and Hamas leader Khaled Mashaal, in Damascus, during Carter's Middle East tour later this month.
April 10th, 2008
“So I used to step on the colored tiles… and count. Yes! I would count how many of each colored tile did I step on using each leg. The main issue here is that I have to, eventually, step on an equal amount of the colored tiles using both my legs,” Kinan from Jar of Juice, on his Colored Tile Complex.
April 8th, 2008
So, another Arab summit comes and goes. This time it was the all awaited Damascus summit. As you can see, this roundup is almost a week late, simply because I couldn't find anyone who's actually writing about the summit - which tells you exactly how little people have come to expect from these annual gatherings.
Of course, as with every Arab summit, this year has its own drama - who will attend? Given all the bickering and tension between Syria on one side, and the Saudi-Egyptian-Jordanian triangle on the other, people were expecting a showdown. Differences over Lebanon, Palestine, Iraq and Syria's alliance with Iran has driven the relations between Syria and Saudi Arabia into an all time low, and even for a time, threatened to thwart the whole Arab Summit.
Rime Allaf gives us a wonderful wrap up of the situation before the summit:
Syria is anxious to avoid a humiliating no-show from the big names. Repeatedly trying, and repeatedly failing, to secure Saudi approval for a visit by Foreign Minister Walid Muallem to deliver the official summit invitation, Syria finally resigned itself to send it at a much lower level, illustrating the depth of the gulf between Riyadh and Damascus. It will not have helped, of course, that Lebanon was the last of 22 countries to be invited to the summit, in a manner defying protocol and typical of Syrian “diplomacy”: handed to a resigned minister of the Lebanese cabinet by an official of the Syrian Foreign Ministry, it wasn't even signed by the host of the event, but by the Syrian Prime Minister.
The summit also meant a great deal of logistic work, Damascus with its old infrastructure needed an emergency face-lift, the preparations reached some extreme levels with closing down the airport and some parts of the capital. Sasa tells us about that.
And this morning, the airport closed (yes, that's right, it closed - shut down until next week - no civilian flights in or out of Damascus International Airport, and no-one is allowed to fly over Syria's capital). That was only announced a couple of days ago - unless you're a Syrianair passenger, in which case, it still hasn't been announced!. That didn't even happen during the Iraq War.
And so, the long awaited summit took place, but not without Lebanon boycotting it. The results of the summit?
The final statement of the summit, was called the “Damascus Declaration”. Almarfaa blog, wonders, is it a coincidence that the name “Damascus Declaration” has thus far been associated with the biggest opposition umbrella group?
وهي حركة - إن كانت مقصودة وأتوقع انها كذلك - تهدف إلى محاولة إخفاء وتهميش (إعلان دمشق) المعارض للنظام وتخفيف تأثيره الإعلامي بعد أن تم تخفيف تأثيره السياسي من خلال الاعتقالات لجميع قياداته وأعضاءه في أسلوب قمعي متخلف ينم عن حقد دفين لأي حركة معارضة مهما كانت سلمية !
هناك فرق كبير بين (إعلان دمشق) المعارض .. و(إعلان دمشق) التابع للقمة العربية !This is a move -if it was intentional, and I think it was- that aims to hide and marginalize the “Damascus Declaration” that is opposed to the regime, and to weaken its effect on the media, after it has weakened its political effect with the arrest of all its leaders, in a repressive manner that only reflects deep hatred against any opposition movement, no matter how peaceful it is!
There is a big difference between the Opposition's “Damascus Declaration”, and the Arab summit's “Damascus Declaration”
As for attendance, Ibrahim Hamidi sums it up on Joshua Landis' blog,
The final answer is 11.
The countries whose Heads of State came were: Syria, Kuwait, Qatar, UAE, Mauritania, Algeria, Tunisia, Sudan, Kozzor
al kamar, Palestine, Libya,Heads of State who never attend Arab summits: Oman, Morocco
Heads of State who declined to attend: Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Egypt, Yemen, Bahrain.
Boycott: Lebanon.
Yes, yes. Another year, another summit.
0 comments · »»
| Korea content supported by |
![]() |
Japan content supported by |
![]() |