“By all rights, Paulo Coelho's The Alchemist should have single-handedly delivered a knock-out blow to any popular conception that Latin American literature is ‘good' literature. The novel is, simply put, execrable tripe.” So begins Posthegemony's ranting review of what it terms Coelho's famous work of “anti-literature”. Still, Jon admits that “the Alchemist must do something for someone–perhaps even for 85 million someones.”

















Send this by E-mail













Veronica Khokhlova5248 posts
Eduardo Avila1426 posts
Salam Adil104 posts
Javits Rajendran8 posts
Lina Ben Mhenni2 posts
Nermeen Edrees5 posts
Oiwan Lam2827 posts
Ismail Dhorat1 posts
Vilhelm Konnander262 posts
Jennifer Brea332 posts
Jon Gosier1 posts
Elena Ignatova5 posts
Ranting? Heh, I could show you ranting… I thought I was rather restrained.
[...] I didn’t quite love it. I mean, it was okay, but I expected something special from a bestseller like this. Well, it was somewhat too long (although it isn’t long at all compared to some other books) and too religious for me, although there are some good points made there. Rephrasing the main idea, “everybody should go for their dream”. Certainly, there is a hell lot of truth in it. I’m not sure if I needed a whole book to think about that. But yeah, many people need the nudge and the book should do it. There are also a lot of other ideas covered on the book, but I won’t just go into details now… [...]